Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alarming fact about background checks. [View all]metalbot
(1,058 posts)63. You can stretch the commerce clause pretty far
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn
Essentially arguing that by growing wheat for himself, the farmer was not purchasing on the open market, and was therefore affecting the market price, affecting interstate commerce.
You could essentially use the same logic that private sales of firearms impact market price of firearms, therefore falling under the commerce clause.
I don't think UBC's were overlooked, I suspect it was that they'd be hard to implement, would impose a burden on some people (for example, what happens if you live three hours from the nearest licensed dealer?), and at the time they would have been so wildly unpopular that it would have jeopardized the rest of the bill.
Essentially arguing that by growing wheat for himself, the farmer was not purchasing on the open market, and was therefore affecting the market price, affecting interstate commerce.
You could essentially use the same logic that private sales of firearms impact market price of firearms, therefore falling under the commerce clause.
I don't think UBC's were overlooked, I suspect it was that they'd be hard to implement, would impose a burden on some people (for example, what happens if you live three hours from the nearest licensed dealer?), and at the time they would have been so wildly unpopular that it would have jeopardized the rest of the bill.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UBC should be federal - otherwise neighboring states could be source of illegitimate guns
jpak
Jun 2016
#19
But not semi-auto which are damn near as deadly and not that difficult to convert.
Hoyt
Jun 2016
#53
Not true. An occasional seller can set up a table, drape a confederate flag over it
Hoyt
Jun 2016
#54
Well you see...gunz are special...they get to be treated like The Precious. Better not to ask.
Rex
Jun 2016
#14
Good, let us know which ones you're wiling to get rid of before we pass more ineffective laws.
DonP
Jun 2016
#50
i remember WELL REGULATED is in the 2nd amendment as well. WELL REGULATED.
pansypoo53219
Jun 2016
#33