Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chelsea Clinton just tweeted about the birth of her son. [View all]OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)62. Let's see if I understand this.
Chelsea Clinton got married, waited a couple of years, THEN got pregnant.
Why didn't she get herself knocked up at 17, drop out of high school; have the baby; go on Dancing With the Stars; try her own reality TV show; get knocked up again; get engaged; break the engagement . . . .
Chelsea must be some special kind of stupid.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
More or less "left" than assigning political motivations to a mere infant?
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#107
Since we seem to love the idea of treating political families like royalty now
davidn3600
Jun 2016
#37
Glance up-thread. There are already several posts from Clinton fans assuming this baby will
Marr
Jun 2016
#96
Oh there were one or two jokes along those lines. Anyone taking them seriously needs
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#105
I am about ready to skip DU until the 20th, but for all I know it's going to move again.
moriah
Jun 2016
#83
I'd suggest simply using the child's name-- regardless that it would ruin your narrative.
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#108