Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(35,300 posts)
3. I'll compare two buildings and schools.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:05 PM
Jun 2016

The first is still state of the art. Less than a decade out, it was built with wifi, a modern auditorium and sound system. It was built with AP biology, chemistry, and physics labs, fully equipped. It has a video studio and during its announcements broadcasts the announcements live and switches to videotape or video-from-disk when it's appropriate.

"Cheers to our football team, shown here making its winning goal for Homecoming." Then it'll cut back to the student "announcers."

It's first year open it was rated "failing." It squeaked by with a 69.6 the second year. And then went to failing until the new ranking system took effect. Its AP classes were offered in the first year, and second year, and third year. As of a couple of years ago, it had managed to actually give no AP classes. Offered, they were cancelled. It has police called to fights every couple of weeks. Over 100 fights per year. Its dual-credit classes are rare, in history or English.


The second is an IB school. It has AP classes offered in biology, chemistry, physics, environmental science. The first three sciences have at least one teacher that teachers just AP classes. It has a dual-credit English teacher. That's all she teaches.

The second school's orchestra places regularly in the top 5 for the state, top 10 for the nation. One part of the orchestra room is roped off. Bricks are falling out of the wall. The band boy's bathroom toilet doesn't work; a brick hit it and shattered it. Some classrooms, during the recent heavy rains in Texas, had to use beakers to catch rain water ... in the classroom. While you can't see light through the walls, some in the classroom halls are cracked.

The point is that the building is almost 40 years old and is crumbling in places. It's on its second set of carpeting. Paint is off the wall i some classrooms. It's a 1-to-1 campus, which means all students have computers; in most classrooms, most wall sockets don't work.


The crumbling building's student body was "recommended" while the new, state-of-the-art building's student body was ranked failing.

Similarly, I visited a university as part of a job. It had smart boards, projectors, all kinds of whistles and bells. It was a tier 3 school. You can't get into the top ranked schools, you can't get into the also-ran schools, you can get into this one. One notch above an average community college.

For summer school I visited an overseas university that is the premier school in a poor country. It trains decent graduates. It's basically an underfunded tier 1 school, the absence of funds playing out in the limited high-tech programs. So it offers limited research and training in some STEM fields that require a lot of hands-on advanced technology. The blackboard in "my" classroom was not on the wall, but propped against the wall. At least at my Tier 1 US university dept. building the chalkboard was affixed to the wall. (Then again, you could see daylight through the wall in the dept. office, and we're not talking "window" either. The wall cracked right through.)

Quality of building is not the same as quality of the students in them. Sure, surroundings can make a difference--asbestos, mold, slime, etc., are dangerous. If everything's brown and old it's hard to be upbeat. Most of these things are cheap to fix, but that's not where the complaints are (and often cheap fixes are easily cheaply destroyed). If the building is heated, well enough lit, and you can see what the teacher writes on the board, you have history, English, and a good number of subjects. Even at the AP and IB level--or the graduate level. It may not let you hold up your head with pride at how new and nifty your surroundings are, but when you rank a school it's really the students that are ranked. Bricks and computer projectors don't take tests. Much of the educational discourse around surroundings is to make excuses for the students. Remember: Over half of a student's learning depends on things other than the school--that includes the building, the teachers, the texts, and the administration.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Campaign Finance Reform a...»Reply #3