Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clarence Thomas may be next to leave Supreme Court [View all]brer cat
(27,452 posts)37. She is 83
and has been battling cancer. It would not be surprising if she retired with a dem President to replace her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's lost his mouthpiece and muse. He's actually had to speak from the bench since Scalia's demise.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#13
A fool like Trump appointing Supreme Court Justices is a horror too awful to contemplate.
NNadir
Jun 2016
#10
They had no choice for the first two. They have a tortured justification for this travesty...
NNadir
Jun 2016
#81
So when Hillary beats Trump we'll be down to 7 justices because they won't let her replace them too.
TeamPooka
Jun 2016
#11
Damn right. A President Clinton will appoint neoconservative corporatist judges that will
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#32
You don't suppose for a moment that Bill is the Clinton I'm referring to? Really?
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#131
No, I suppost that i at least an indicator of the type of justice she would appoint,
Amimnoch
Jun 2016
#137
"Baseless assertion"? Really? Tell me then, upon what base do you reach the conclusion that
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#149
No doubt, you believe your own faith-based prophecies to be righteous, full of merit and valid...
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#153
I have no idea what brought Bill into this. I certainly didn't bring him up. And I certainly
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#148
Quiz - Who Voted Against Citizens United? How Did The Clinton Appointees Vote?
TomCADem
Jun 2016
#123
if Hillary wins, she immediately becomes a lame duck, hence republicans have the right
Gabi Hayes
Jun 2016
#20
I can see those concentration camps for those who oppose him and our constitution being
kimbutgar
Jun 2016
#46
He might as well, now that his Dr. Evil who was doing his thinking for him is gone.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2016
#15
But of course, we need to keep fighting within our party to be sure we depress our own vote.
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
#19
It's been a quarter century since we've had a qualified African American on SCOTUS
Bucky
Jun 2016
#30
Because he knows he'll fail all the tests, now that he can't copy the answers off Scalia's papers?
LeftishBrit
Jun 2016
#38
He doesn't know what the fuck to do now that Scalia's not there for him to agree with
Scootaloo
Jun 2016
#41
For years, I wished Scalia would go away, and I didn't care how or why..
mountain grammy
Jun 2016
#70
Too bad Hillary isn't liberal. The knock down drag out fight between Hillary
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#104
As I suspected, you agree that Hillary is to the right of Obama and look at who
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#115
Do you really think that emoticon will get under my skin? Don't you think it's a bit
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#143
I see an interesting opportunity here to appoint a person of color with a background
trc
Jun 2016
#114
Well, his brain is already dead: Scalia is no longer there to think for him. eom
Betty Karlson
Jun 2016
#122
Not surprising. With scalia gone it's probably not as much fun for him anymore.
calimary
Jun 2016
#152
