Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clarence Thomas may be next to leave Supreme Court [View all]zappaman
(20,627 posts)105. Bill Clinton appointed Ginsberg and Breyer, Rick.
Guess you don't like them?
What makes you think Hillary would appoint conservatives, Rick?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's lost his mouthpiece and muse. He's actually had to speak from the bench since Scalia's demise.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#13
A fool like Trump appointing Supreme Court Justices is a horror too awful to contemplate.
NNadir
Jun 2016
#10
They had no choice for the first two. They have a tortured justification for this travesty...
NNadir
Jun 2016
#81
So when Hillary beats Trump we'll be down to 7 justices because they won't let her replace them too.
TeamPooka
Jun 2016
#11
Damn right. A President Clinton will appoint neoconservative corporatist judges that will
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#32
You don't suppose for a moment that Bill is the Clinton I'm referring to? Really?
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#131
No, I suppost that i at least an indicator of the type of justice she would appoint,
Amimnoch
Jun 2016
#137
"Baseless assertion"? Really? Tell me then, upon what base do you reach the conclusion that
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#149
No doubt, you believe your own faith-based prophecies to be righteous, full of merit and valid...
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#153
I have no idea what brought Bill into this. I certainly didn't bring him up. And I certainly
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#148
Quiz - Who Voted Against Citizens United? How Did The Clinton Appointees Vote?
TomCADem
Jun 2016
#123
if Hillary wins, she immediately becomes a lame duck, hence republicans have the right
Gabi Hayes
Jun 2016
#20
I can see those concentration camps for those who oppose him and our constitution being
kimbutgar
Jun 2016
#46
He might as well, now that his Dr. Evil who was doing his thinking for him is gone.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2016
#15
But of course, we need to keep fighting within our party to be sure we depress our own vote.
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
#19
It's been a quarter century since we've had a qualified African American on SCOTUS
Bucky
Jun 2016
#30
Because he knows he'll fail all the tests, now that he can't copy the answers off Scalia's papers?
LeftishBrit
Jun 2016
#38
He doesn't know what the fuck to do now that Scalia's not there for him to agree with
Scootaloo
Jun 2016
#41
For years, I wished Scalia would go away, and I didn't care how or why..
mountain grammy
Jun 2016
#70
Too bad Hillary isn't liberal. The knock down drag out fight between Hillary
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#104
As I suspected, you agree that Hillary is to the right of Obama and look at who
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#115
Do you really think that emoticon will get under my skin? Don't you think it's a bit
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#143
I see an interesting opportunity here to appoint a person of color with a background
trc
Jun 2016
#114
Well, his brain is already dead: Scalia is no longer there to think for him. eom
Betty Karlson
Jun 2016
#122
Not surprising. With scalia gone it's probably not as much fun for him anymore.
calimary
Jun 2016
#152