Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
17. I think this is unfair libel of her. The real motive, which they won't admit, is that
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 10:22 AM
Jun 2016

they fear rebroadcasting the ISIS pledge will "inspire" others to follow suit.

But they don't want to say that.

As for Baptists trying to protect Islam, that's almost the funniest thing I have ever read. Almost. Or perhaps it would be, if the context were less dire.

I do believe Lynch would try to protect constitutional freedoms, and one of those is the freedom of worship and practice - but in the US, that freedom does not include the right to violate the civil rights of other people who don't share your beliefs. There is no way that Lynch is trying to protect the shooter, or others who want to do the same thing.

I do think this is misguided and mistaken - but it's not being done because the administration wants to protect terrorists.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think it's a really bad move. Everyone already is aware of the facts you mention cali Jun 2016 #1
Lynch is religious and seeks to protect religion so that religion can continue to harm LGBT Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #7
I didn't know that. Thanks for the information. cali Jun 2016 #9
Her answers about the drug war and cannabis reform were also entirely faith based and Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #11
I think this is unfair libel of her. The real motive, which they won't admit, is that Yo_Mama Jun 2016 #17
Attempting to avoid inspiring other Jihadist attacks. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #2
Yes, I think you're right. n/t Yo_Mama Jun 2016 #16
So now the authorities are being overly "politically correct"? FLPanhandle Jun 2016 #3
Free Republic is that way. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #18
No, it shouldn't. I agree with the decision not to give him a permanent platform pnwmom Jun 2016 #4
It's already out there. And his permanent platform is the slaughter of 49 cali Jun 2016 #5
agreed, its common knowledge already. This just looks stupid Amishman Jun 2016 #6
In the age of social media and instant communication cali Jun 2016 #8
This is very similar to the UC merced stabber also had a manifesto Jesus Malverde Jun 2016 #13
Why release any part of the transcript then? oberliner Jun 2016 #15
That is some sweet Memory Holin' AngryAmish Jun 2016 #10
1984 B2G Jun 2016 #12
This is insane melman Jun 2016 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The killer pledging alleg...»Reply #17