Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)A look at the 4 gun bills up for vote in Senate [View all]
Gregory Korte, USA TODAYThe proposals scheduled for a vote Monday all as amendments to a Justice Department spending bill include:
► An amendment by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., would allow the attorney general to deny a gun sale to anyone if she has a "reasonable belief" a lesser standard than "probable cause" that the buyer was likely to engage in terrorism. The proposal is popularly known as the "no-fly, no-buy" amendment, but wouldn't just apply to people on the "no fly" terrorist watch list.
► An Republican alternative by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, which would require that law enforcement be alerted when anyone on the terror watch list attempts to buy a weapon from a licensed dealer. If the buyer has been investigated for terrorism within the past five years, the attorney general could block a sale for up to three days while a court reviews the sale.
► An amendment by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, would make it more difficult to add mentally ill people to the background check database, giving people suspected of serious mental illness a process to challenge that determination.
► An amendment by Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., that would close the "gun show loophole" by requiring every gun purchaser to undergo a background check, and to expand the background check database.
The vast majority of Americans support "No fly, no buy" and background checks at gun shows and online. I've contacted my senators repeatedly! This is another "Make me!" moment in politics!
Let your senators know it is time to start fixing this!
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On the "no fly, no buy" will people be notified of being on the list and being able to appeal?
aikoaiko
Jun 2016
#1
The Orlando shooter (I refuse to add to his notoriety by using his name) had a weapon permit
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#27
'Due process' is to protect us from arbitrary application of government authority.
yallerdawg
Jun 2016
#38
If you want to change the background check laws, shreadding our 5th Amendment isn't the way to do it
NutmegYankee
Jun 2016
#47