Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:28 PM Jun 2016

Wall Street to Clinton: Our money or Elizabeth Warren as VP. [View all]

Note: It's my understanding that as of today, there is no more GD-P. This is simply a news article; it is not criticizing HRC.


Big Wall Street donors have a message for Hillary Clinton: Keep Elizabeth Warren off the ticket or risk losing millions of dollars in contributions.

In a dozen interviews, major Democratic donors in the financial services industry said they saw little chance that Clinton would pick the liberal firebrand as her vice presidential nominee. These donors despise Warren’s attacks on the financial industry. But they also think her selection would be damaging to the economy. And they warned that if Clinton surprises them and taps Warren, big donations from the industry could vanish.

“If Clinton picked Warren, her whole base on Wall Street would leave her,” said one top Democratic donor who has helped raise millions for Clinton. “They would literally just say, ‘We have no qualms with you moving left, we understand all the things you’ve had to do because of Bernie Sanders, but if you are going there with Warren, we just can’t trust you, you’ve killed it.’”

Most big donors don’t want Warren on the ticket because she is the most accomplished anti-Wall Street populist in the Democratic Party. But many also think her presence would drive a potential Clinton administration too far to the left, poison relations with the private sector from the start and ultimately be damaging to the economy.


<snip>

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/elizabeth-warren-wall-street-vice-president-224489

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/20/

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Plunk.... peace13 Jun 2016 #1
Always? frazzled Jun 2016 #4
I don't care if she is chosen. The damage is done to her career and that is my point. peace13 Jun 2016 #8
Damage? bvar22 Jun 2016 #17
You misinterpreted my concerns. peace13 Jun 2016 #31
I think ... frazzled Jun 2016 #20
Really?? If we got more Warrens in, then Wall Street would be the ones fearful adigal Jun 2016 #9
Clinton has no desire to make Wall Street fearful. peace13 Jun 2016 #14
What are you talking about? I was rude? What an odd response!!!!! adigal Jun 2016 #32
HRC should tell them to fuck off. nt cyberswede Jun 2016 #2
I agree...against Trump, who is self-imploding, does she really need Wall Street money?? adigal Jun 2016 #10
Agreed big time bjobotts Jun 2016 #25
Makes no sense since Warren does more damage as a senator than she ever could as VP besides bjobotts Jun 2016 #24
Theater. joshcryer Jun 2016 #3
I never thought she was an enemy of capitalism mdbl Jun 2016 #7
Actually it's 'unregulated' capitalism. Warren is definitely NOT Wall street's dream since she bjobotts Jun 2016 #26
A government facilitated breakup could be crooked. joshcryer Jun 2016 #29
The banks are already CROOKED. TBTF banks were convicted of rigging markets among other things think Jun 2016 #34
A government facilitated breakup would soften the blow. joshcryer Jun 2016 #35
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #36
I can see where this is headed, if Warren The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #5
Hardly... Chan790 Jun 2016 #37
Why would anybody want Elizabeth Warren as VEEP? longship Jun 2016 #6
Yeah, what he said...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #11
Agreed. nt. BootinUp Jun 2016 #15
I agree. cali Jun 2016 #19
A hundred times this. Saviolo Jun 2016 #21
Part of me thinks they're using Warren as a trial balloon justiceischeap Jun 2016 #12
Davis would be a terrible choice. There is a much better TX-focused choice. Chan790 Jun 2016 #40
If Wall Street wants to keep Warren out of the way, VP is the BEST place to put her. hughee99 Jun 2016 #13
Maybe it's a con... Saviolo Jun 2016 #27
I guess that this rules her out RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #16
I don't want Warren in the VP slot the ticket, either, because she is more powerful and tblue37 Jun 2016 #18
Hillary could call their bluff. They won't fund Trump because he is a doofus. Her choice, still. . n Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #22
The thing is "big wall street donors" can't give more than $2700. George II Jun 2016 #23
Yeah--this the third time I've seen this article ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #33
Good. She can do way more damage to them in the Senate. n/t Bonhomme Richard Jun 2016 #28
Regardless, I prefer Xavier Beccera BainsBane Jun 2016 #30
After Brexit jcgoldie Jun 2016 #38
I would think Wall Street would love Warren as VP davidn3600 Jun 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street to Clinton: ...