Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(68,405 posts)
18. I don't want Warren in the VP slot the ticket, either, because she is more powerful and
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 01:17 PM
Jun 2016

more valuable in the Senate. The VP is mostly a ceremonial slot. She has a lot more power and visibility in the Senate, and we need her to stay there.

I sure hope Hillary doesn't choose Tim Kaine. I suspect she will tap Julian Castro, though I think he could stand to get more experience and more seasoning before being made VP.

The reason I am thinking Castro is that he gave the keynote speech at the last DNC. That is what they do with someone they are grooming for a future presidential bid. Clinton, Kerry, and Obama each gave the keynote at the convention during the campaign season directly before running for president.

Also, Trump has so alienated the hispanic vote that there has been a rush among hispanic immigrants to get naturalized and registered to vote, and including Castro on the ticket might be seen as a way to encourage even more immigrants to get naturalized and more hispanic citizens to get registered and to get out and vote.

OTOH,the campaign might figure that Trump himself is a sufficient motivation to increase the hispanic vote, so that it might be better to choose a VP who could motivate another voting bloc.

I just hope Hillary doesn't fill her VP slot and her cabinet with senators, governors, or other powerful pols from various states, leaving their offices open for Republicans to fill. Here in Kansas, we lost Sebelius to Obama's cabinet and we have never recovered from the extreme right wing takeover of the state. Especially I hope she doesn't pick a senator from a state with a Republican governor who would then be able to place a Republican into the empty seat. We have a chance to regain the senate majority, so it would be beyond foolish to give up a senate seat that way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Plunk.... peace13 Jun 2016 #1
Always? frazzled Jun 2016 #4
I don't care if she is chosen. The damage is done to her career and that is my point. peace13 Jun 2016 #8
Damage? bvar22 Jun 2016 #17
You misinterpreted my concerns. peace13 Jun 2016 #31
I think ... frazzled Jun 2016 #20
Really?? If we got more Warrens in, then Wall Street would be the ones fearful adigal Jun 2016 #9
Clinton has no desire to make Wall Street fearful. peace13 Jun 2016 #14
What are you talking about? I was rude? What an odd response!!!!! adigal Jun 2016 #32
HRC should tell them to fuck off. nt cyberswede Jun 2016 #2
I agree...against Trump, who is self-imploding, does she really need Wall Street money?? adigal Jun 2016 #10
Agreed big time bjobotts Jun 2016 #25
Makes no sense since Warren does more damage as a senator than she ever could as VP besides bjobotts Jun 2016 #24
Theater. joshcryer Jun 2016 #3
I never thought she was an enemy of capitalism mdbl Jun 2016 #7
Actually it's 'unregulated' capitalism. Warren is definitely NOT Wall street's dream since she bjobotts Jun 2016 #26
A government facilitated breakup could be crooked. joshcryer Jun 2016 #29
The banks are already CROOKED. TBTF banks were convicted of rigging markets among other things think Jun 2016 #34
A government facilitated breakup would soften the blow. joshcryer Jun 2016 #35
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #36
I can see where this is headed, if Warren The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #5
Hardly... Chan790 Jun 2016 #37
Why would anybody want Elizabeth Warren as VEEP? longship Jun 2016 #6
Yeah, what he said...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #11
Agreed. nt. BootinUp Jun 2016 #15
I agree. cali Jun 2016 #19
A hundred times this. Saviolo Jun 2016 #21
Part of me thinks they're using Warren as a trial balloon justiceischeap Jun 2016 #12
Davis would be a terrible choice. There is a much better TX-focused choice. Chan790 Jun 2016 #40
If Wall Street wants to keep Warren out of the way, VP is the BEST place to put her. hughee99 Jun 2016 #13
Maybe it's a con... Saviolo Jun 2016 #27
I guess that this rules her out RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #16
I don't want Warren in the VP slot the ticket, either, because she is more powerful and tblue37 Jun 2016 #18
Hillary could call their bluff. They won't fund Trump because he is a doofus. Her choice, still. . n Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #22
The thing is "big wall street donors" can't give more than $2700. George II Jun 2016 #23
Yeah--this the third time I've seen this article ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #33
Good. She can do way more damage to them in the Senate. n/t Bonhomme Richard Jun 2016 #28
Regardless, I prefer Xavier Beccera BainsBane Jun 2016 #30
After Brexit jcgoldie Jun 2016 #38
I would think Wall Street would love Warren as VP davidn3600 Jun 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street to Clinton: ...»Reply #18