Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ismnotwasm

(42,674 posts)

33. Yeah--this the third time I've seen this article

Reply to George II (Reply #23)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 09:32 PM

Jun 2016

It hasn't improved in apparent veracity

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wall Street to Clinton: Our money or Elizabeth Warren as VP. [View all] cali Jun 2016 OP

Plunk.... peace13 Jun 2016 #1

Always? frazzled Jun 2016 #4

I don't care if she is chosen. The damage is done to her career and that is my point. peace13 Jun 2016 #8

Damage? bvar22 Jun 2016 #17

You misinterpreted my concerns. peace13 Jun 2016 #31

I think ... frazzled Jun 2016 #20

Really?? If we got more Warrens in, then Wall Street would be the ones fearful adigal Jun 2016 #9

Clinton has no desire to make Wall Street fearful. peace13 Jun 2016 #14

What are you talking about? I was rude? What an odd response!!!!! adigal Jun 2016 #32

HRC should tell them to fuck off. nt cyberswede Jun 2016 #2

I agree...against Trump, who is self-imploding, does she really need Wall Street money?? adigal Jun 2016 #10

Agreed big time bjobotts Jun 2016 #25

Makes no sense since Warren does more damage as a senator than she ever could as VP besides bjobotts Jun 2016 #24

Theater. joshcryer Jun 2016 #3

I never thought she was an enemy of capitalism mdbl Jun 2016 #7

Actually it's 'unregulated' capitalism. Warren is definitely NOT Wall street's dream since she bjobotts Jun 2016 #26

A government facilitated breakup could be crooked. joshcryer Jun 2016 #29

The banks are already CROOKED. TBTF banks were convicted of rigging markets among other things think Jun 2016 #34

A government facilitated breakup would soften the blow. joshcryer Jun 2016 #35

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #36

I can see where this is headed, if Warren The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #5

Hardly... Chan790 Jun 2016 #37

Why would anybody want Elizabeth Warren as VEEP? longship Jun 2016 #6

Yeah, what he said...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #11

Agreed. nt. BootinUp Jun 2016 #15

I agree. cali Jun 2016 #19

A hundred times this. Saviolo Jun 2016 #21

Part of me thinks they're using Warren as a trial balloon justiceischeap Jun 2016 #12

Davis would be a terrible choice. There is a much better TX-focused choice. Chan790 Jun 2016 #40

If Wall Street wants to keep Warren out of the way, VP is the BEST place to put her. hughee99 Jun 2016 #13

Maybe it's a con... Saviolo Jun 2016 #27

I guess that this rules her out RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #16

I don't want Warren in the VP slot the ticket, either, because she is more powerful and tblue37 Jun 2016 #18

Hillary could call their bluff. They won't fund Trump because he is a doofus. Her choice, still. . n Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #22

The thing is "big wall street donors" can't give more than $2700. George II Jun 2016 #23

Yeah--this the third time I've seen this article ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #33

Good. She can do way more damage to them in the Senate. n/t Bonhomme Richard Jun 2016 #28

Regardless, I prefer Xavier Beccera BainsBane Jun 2016 #30

After Brexit jcgoldie Jun 2016 #38

I would think Wall Street would love Warren as VP davidn3600 Jun 2016 #39