Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(66,527 posts)
4. Richard Dawkins explored this nicely in The Blind Watchmaker
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 11:49 AM
Jun 2016

He drew a clear and important distinction between something that is "unimaginable" versus something that is "incalculable." In practical terms, most mundane humans can't imagine the unlikelihood of natural quadruplets (especially not those who insist that they can!), but we can readily calculate that unlikelihood.

I was once involved in a near-miss accident on icy roads, with my car spinning about 540° through oncoming traffic. We survived unhurt and with only a tiny ding in our bumper. Friends later told us that the odds against such a thing were "astronomical." I can't crunch the math, but I'd have to guess that our odds were probably something closer to one-in-fifty, but that didn't stop armchair statisticians from citing it as "miraculous" proof of God's grace.


As a species, and absent formal study of statistics, we seem to have a pretty weak overall sense of probability.


k/r

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Improbability Princip...»Reply #4