Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald: People on watch list have a right to get guns. Democrats suck for thinking otherwise. [View all]MattP
(3,304 posts)5. Greenwald calls it a war on due process but if anybody ever
On the Terror watch list tried to buy a gun triggered a fbi call 49 lives in Orlando may be alive today he argues the Dems war on due process predates Orlando, wtf is his problem anyway
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Greenwald: People on watch list have a right to get guns. Democrats suck for thinking otherwise. [View all]
arely staircase
Jun 2016
OP
No right is beyond limits. I can't slander Glen, despite free speech. Terrorists shouldn't get guns.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#1
How often will someone NEED that gun before they can prove their innocence?
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#19
Obviously, we're fine with it since we're fighting for that right no in congress! (ntxt)
scscholar
Jun 2016
#91
You can slander or defame Glen all you want, and you won't be charged with a crime.
Captain Stern
Jun 2016
#62
Yes, I would like to hear of this mythical place where guns are "strictly controlled."
Orrex
Jun 2016
#90
Sorry, casual, but I have seen people arm up when "affected by gun violence."
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#126
It isn't. The right to travel is a fundamental right. But using airports is a privilege. nt
msanthrope
Jun 2016
#12
with respect to international air travel, your position has been rejected by the courts
JustinL
Jun 2016
#43
Thanks.....but what you cite actually proves my point. Google Law School is generally
msanthrope
Jun 2016
#45
You should tell that to the Court. They continued to reject your point in a later ruling.
JustinL
Jun 2016
#54
Yes....It's interesting how you think a single decision in the 9th circuit confers a fundamental
msanthrope
Jun 2016
#58
The Ninth Court didn't "confer" a right. It recognized a restriction of a constitutional liberty.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#128
Been an issue since the Bush years. Just thought we'd be rid of these lists by now.
NutmegYankee
Jun 2016
#25
This would mean his White Supramacist civil clients would not be able to buy guns.
msanthrope
Jun 2016
#10
The Feds already have: the 4th Amendment the Feds took away our rights without due process
MagickMuffin
Jun 2016
#98
Yep. One prohibition (the WOD) got the 4th; the other attempt (on GUNZ!) goes after the 5th.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#131
I think most Democrats would prefer stricter gun control for everyone.The terror watch list
femmedem
Jun 2016
#23
I wouldn't expect anything less from the man who supported President Bush when he signed the Patriot
still_one
Jun 2016
#29
LOL. You don't get it. You are attacking him personally and not what he says or what he
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#39
What do you fear from those that want the truth? Will they rock your comfy bubble
rhett o rick
Jul 2016
#114
Many same sex couples had to live outside the US because the US did not give LGBT any rights
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#70
I didn't hate the watch list...believe it is needed for some sick fucks out there
snooper2
Jun 2016
#74
The problem is that it is easily turned into a way for the government to persecute...
Odin2005
Jun 2016
#100
greenwald sucks for not being able to read the first part of the second amendment.
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2016
#56
I think Glenn right. That just illustrates the insanity of the 2nd Amendment and why it needs to go
RAFisher
Jun 2016
#63
Why is this idiot always against Democrats.. even to the point of siding with Republcans??
DCBob
Jun 2016
#64
Mark it on your calendars: I disagree with Glenn Greenwald about something. nt
Electric Monk
Jun 2016
#65
To Protect Hillary Clinton, Democrats Wage War on Their Own Core Citizens United Argument
Electric Monk
Jun 2016
#69
To Protect Hillary Clinton, Democrats Wage War on Their Own Core Citizens United Argument
Electric Monk
Jun 2016
#73
Greenwald thinks he's 'cool' by taking contrary positions on almost everything.
randome
Jun 2016
#77
Much as I loathe and despise Greenwald, on this specific point he's not wrong.
Donald Ian Rankin
Jun 2016
#85
These "young arab men" are not legal residents nor are they citizens of the US.
oneshooter
Jul 2016
#117
I Agree with Glen. The establishment wants a "quick fix" so they can pat themselves on the back
jack_krass
Jun 2016
#106
I would agree if guns weren't weapons and being denied guns was a burden. It's not.
kcr
Jul 2016
#115
And a eight year process to be removed from the list, and the funds needed to do so.
oneshooter
Jul 2016
#121
You keep going back to guns. I am speaking of loosing the right to board an airplane, possably
oneshooter
Jul 2016
#135
Remember when liberals were against the government declaring people terrorists with no due process?
portlander23
Jul 2016
#129
Hats off to the DUers here who support gun-control, but do not support the Terrah Watch List.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#132