Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
16. This is all about interest alignment
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jun 2012

Specifically, philosophical/political alignment between corporate America and the "middle class" work force.

If your retirement and/or life savings are linked to corporate profits, then you are more likely to adopt the philosophy of said profiteers. In other words, your retirement success is dictated by union busting, reduced operating costs (ie wages, benefits), neutard envrionmental protection and worker saftey laws, and handsome rewards for the CEO's that get the fore mentioned agenda accomplished. This is an extension of the "for the good of me" approach as opposed to the "for the good of American workers" approach.

Even Union members are buying in to the notion.

The conservative mantra is always that of "private industry can do it better than government." This mantra is the foundation to their message and only after people generally believe this not to be true, will the move toward privatization with reduced government involvement and/or regulation cease to expand.

The privatization/ corporate control of our collective retirements has been a slow, ongoing process. It started with 401K and will not stop until Social Security and Medicare are privatized as well.


Even after 2008, when most every American took a big hit to their 401k, most are still sold on the idea that corporate America is the "safe play" with retirement.

Myself, I refuse to invest in corporations. My 401k is strictly invested in 3 month US treasury bills. My revenue is reduced, but I will claim that I didn't lose money in 2008 either. On principal, I buy US Treasury bills in the same spirit as those that bought War Bonds during WW2. It is for the good of the country plus I don't trust 'em (corporate officers). They won't be happy until they steal your retirement.










Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This fraud is nothing new Cary Jun 2012 #1
With mutual fund fees, I get a prospectus and an annual report, two publications each year, Common Sense Party Jun 2012 #9
Are you sure? Cary Jun 2012 #11
Are you also reading the SAI? Paulie Jun 2012 #14
I'm not reading the SAI because I'm not buying funds. Cary Jun 2012 #18
* and Cheney wanted to convert Social Security to a gian 401(k) account. no_hypocrisy Jun 2012 #2
Many people are gradually wising up to the way Wall Street is rigged Mairead Jun 2012 #3
K&R. Another fraud we were warned about over and over again. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #4
Could you use and extra $155,000 when you retire? KansDem Jun 2012 #5
not surprising as they were meant to benefit mopinko Jun 2012 #6
Yes, so many have dipped into their 401ks... CoffeeCat Jun 2012 #7
There is a 10% penalty for early withdrawal, not 30%. Common Sense Party Jun 2012 #10
There should be no problem when more people are withdrawing from 401(k) than contributing. ieoeja Jun 2012 #19
All my money is tied up in mattresses. RagAss Jun 2012 #8
The methodology for this "study" is highy suspect. JoePhilly Jun 2012 #12
Finally. I've been saying this over and over and over. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #13
Yep, but try getting the money out of Wall Street now. shcrane71 Jun 2012 #15
This is all about interest alignment mick063 Jun 2012 #16
Yes, I do FreeJoe Jun 2012 #17
I remember looking into this many years ago. airplaneman Jun 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 401(k) System: Great ...»Reply #16