Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Fucking Horrible. Fucking Typical. Nothing to see here. [View all]
Obama-appointed judge strikes down federal fracking rule
The decision is a major loss for the administration, which worked for years to update its oil and natural gas drilling regulations to account for dramatic increases and innovations in fracking.
Judge Scott Skavdahl of the District Court of Wyoming agreed with the arguments of industry groups and a handful of western states that said Congress has expressly forbidden Interior from getting into fracking with a 2005 law, with few exceptions.
Congress has not delegated to the Department of Interior the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing, Skavdahl wrote in his opinion published late Tuesday. The [Bureau of Land Managements] effort to do so through the Fracking Rule is in excess of its statutory authority and contrary to law.
Interior had countered with the argument it has broad authority over oil and natural gas development on federal and American-Indian land the only places where the rule would be enforced. But Skavdahl, who was nominated in 2011 by Obama, disagreed.
<snip>
read:http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/284388-judge-strikes-down-federal-fracking-rule
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you basing that claim against the judge on the text and legislative history of the statute?
merrily
Jun 2016
#5
I know that other judges in other cases have interpreted the 2005 Energy legislation
cali
Jun 2016
#6
On this same point? Nothing in the OP story suggests the judge ignored precedent.
merrily
Jun 2016
#8
There have been tons of cases where federal agencies prevail, but they may have nothing to do with
merrily
Jun 2016
#13
Big no. The only regulatory authority admin. agencies have is what Congress gives them by statute.
merrily
Jun 2016
#15
If Congress actually did expressly forbid regulation by the agency, as the lawsuit claimed, the
merrily
Jun 2016
#4
Maybe, but that is not really relevant to whether the judge's reading of the statute is correct.
merrily
Jun 2016
#12
That's one way to get around a local ordinance and let folks know who is really in charge
Person 2713
Jun 2016
#25
. Did you read the link in the post I was replying to ? If that is how you like the system to work
Person 2713
Jun 2016
#31
Congress could have repealed the Cheney loophole with no risk of veto at any time
merrily
Jun 2016
#30
Except...would Pres. Obama have vetoed repeal of a bill for which Senator Obama had voted?
merrily
Jun 2016
#34
Why say "Obama-appointed judge", you're giving the impression that the reason Obama...
George II
Jun 2016
#29