Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RobinA

(10,478 posts)
5. How Was That
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 07:12 AM
Jun 2016

an obvious line of attack? He serves honorably in Vietnam and then gets attacked by surrogates of someone who not only did not, but has a damn questionable record of National Guard service. Pre-swift boat, it's about the LAST angle I would have expected the Bushsters to take.

That said, the Kerry campaign SHOULD have crucified Bush on his so-called "military" record, but they did not. That was their mistake.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A critique SusanLarson Jun 2016 #1
So you are saying the Secret Service agents are lying? Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #8
Did you? SusanLarson Jun 2016 #10
It rebuts his entire story. Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #11
Rebuttal with actual facts is a powerful thing SusanLarson Jun 2016 #13
They have no obligation to present anything. Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #17
Exactly. Hostile attacks from the right will Hortensis Jun 2016 #26
They rebutted with facts. The primary fact is that he was a low level employee pnwmom Jun 2016 #23
The publisher (Center Street) seems to specialize in bullshit. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #14
We know Byrne is a liar, because his sworn testimony in the Ken Starr investigation pnwmom Jun 2016 #22
This story has been floated by right wingers for years now BainsBane Jun 2016 #24
The US Navy and people who served with him refuted the swiftboating against Kerry. MH1 Jun 2016 #2
Yes, all too many had been livid with Kerry for BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #3
Ironically, the thing that bothered me most about the Kerry swiftboat attack was that TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #4
How Was That RobinA Jun 2016 #5
It was an obvious line of attack because they used EXACTLY the same line of attack TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #16
Yeah, it's a bummer when your candidate exhibits way too much honor. Paladin Jun 2016 #9
As I said above, my comment was in no way a reflection on Kerry as a man, a war hero, and a TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #18
They don't have anything to offer so they produce stories. Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #6
but but but if it is printed it must be true dembotoz Jun 2016 #7
Is this the same publisher as the Swiftboat people? Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #12
No. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #15
No, but my guess is the same ghostwriters were used. nt TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #19
BTW, I was just told in this thread that the Clintons have to prove their innocence. Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #20
I saw that. They don't have to 'prove' their innocence. But it's fair to expect that TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #21
That tactic didn't didn't work too well to those who were accused by Joe McCarthy. still_one Jun 2016 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Secret Service Associatio...»Reply #5