Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why ban the guns that kill the least amount of people, and ignore the ones that kill the most? [View all]anoNY42
(670 posts)3. Furthermore,
It is much harder to have an accidental shooting with a rifle than with a handgun. Children have a harder time lifting a rifle (even a plastic AR-15), and it is difficult to point it at yourself and pull the trigger accidentally.
The one advantage to going after rifles like the AR-15 is that they tend to be loaded with larger magazines and thus a person can cause more damage with fewer reloads. However, the real way to combat this is to restrict magazine size. If someone says "there are a billion 30 round AR magazines out there, no way we can collect them", just keep in mind that most law-abiding owners will turn them in, since large mags really are not needed (especially if they get to keep their rifles).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why ban the guns that kill the least amount of people, and ignore the ones that kill the most? [View all]
MadDAsHell
Jun 2016
OP
Failure, maybe, because it didn't go far enough or long enough. That can be corrected.
Hoyt
Jun 2016
#14
One step at a time, semi-auto pistols next. An AWB will force many gun stores/shows to shut down
Hoyt
Jun 2016
#4
Handgun ownership is Constitutionally protected, as per the Heller decision.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#7
That's what it feels like. What will score us a political win, not what will help us save lives...nt
MadDAsHell
Jun 2016
#10
I think most non-mass shooting murders (the vast majority of gun deaths) are illegal guns...
MadDAsHell
Jun 2016
#35
We are all prophets of our own biases, and read the futures which best validate our desires...
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#27
My biases (and I certainly have them) aside, I find the prospect of the US Congress outlawing
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#37
That's a fair point, but wouldn't the "good" be preventing 80% of deaths, not 20%?
MadDAsHell
Jun 2016
#32
For similar reasons to why the mentally ill are targeted for greater and greater surveillance
HereSince1628
Jun 2016
#38