Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pnwmom

(110,237 posts)

23. They rebutted with facts. The primary fact is that he was a low level employee

Reply to SusanLarson (Reply #13)

Thu Jun 23, 2016, 05:48 AM

Jun 2016

who was not allowed close to the Clintons.

And the Buzz feed article also showed how his book contradicts his own sworn testimony in the Ken Starr investigation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Secret Service Association Calls Author of New Clinton 'Swiftboat' Book A Liar [View all] TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 OP

A critique SusanLarson Jun 2016 #1

So you are saying the Secret Service agents are lying? Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #8

Did you? SusanLarson Jun 2016 #10

It rebuts his entire story. Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #11

Rebuttal with actual facts is a powerful thing SusanLarson Jun 2016 #13

They have no obligation to present anything. Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #17

Exactly. Hostile attacks from the right will Hortensis Jun 2016 #26

They rebutted with facts. The primary fact is that he was a low level employee pnwmom Jun 2016 #23

The publisher (Center Street) seems to specialize in bullshit. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #14

We know Byrne is a liar, because his sworn testimony in the Ken Starr investigation pnwmom Jun 2016 #22

This story has been floated by right wingers for years now BainsBane Jun 2016 #24

The US Navy and people who served with him refuted the swiftboating against Kerry. MH1 Jun 2016 #2

Yes, all too many had been livid with Kerry for BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #3

Ironically, the thing that bothered me most about the Kerry swiftboat attack was that TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #4

How Was That RobinA Jun 2016 #5

It was an obvious line of attack because they used EXACTLY the same line of attack TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #16

Yeah, it's a bummer when your candidate exhibits way too much honor. Paladin Jun 2016 #9

As I said above, my comment was in no way a reflection on Kerry as a man, a war hero, and a TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #18

They don't have anything to offer so they produce stories. Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #6

but but but if it is printed it must be true dembotoz Jun 2016 #7

Is this the same publisher as the Swiftboat people? Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #12

No. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #15

No, but my guess is the same ghostwriters were used. nt TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #19

BTW, I was just told in this thread that the Clintons have to prove their innocence. Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #20

I saw that. They don't have to 'prove' their innocence. But it's fair to expect that TrollBuster9090 Jun 2016 #21

That tactic didn't didn't work too well to those who were accused by Joe McCarthy. still_one Jun 2016 #25