General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is Paul Ryan right about the sit-in being a publicity stunt? [View all]gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Or even more recently with all the Tea Bagger nonsense. But you know what? That Tea Bagger nonsense got the Republicans back into the majority in 2010, and they leveraged that into a stronger majority because they were able to redraw state congressional district maps. Even though Republicans won 52% of the votes in 2014, they controlled 57% of the seats in the House. Turnout was a pathetic 36.4% in 2014, so who was motivated to turn out and vote that year? People who were energized by political stunts.
Will the sit-in on June 22, 2016 result in legislation that will pass constitutional muster on June 23, 2016? Of course not. Will it result in a more receptive Congress after the 2016 elections? We'll see about that; ask yourself who is energized and motivated by the sit-in, and who wants the coverage of the sit-in to end an hour ago and never be mentioned again?