Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
23. Thanks for your kind words, but I somewhat disagree with your follow-up
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 08:00 PM
Jun 2016

You write that "the next president will decide the issue via Supreme Court pick...." Actually, the next President's first decision will be whether to continue the Obama policy. The next President could get back from the Inauguration and, later that day, rescind Obama's directive and order full speed ahead on deportations. That would moot any lawsuits that were then still pending. Nothing would ever get back to the Supreme Court.

If, instead, the next President decides to continue Obama's policy, we can't assume that a new Justice of the Supreme Court will vote to uphold it. An honest judge might oppose a policy but find it constitutional, or, what's applicable here, might think that the President's action would do more good than harm but was nevertheless beyond the President's powers. Supreme Court appointees have notoriously disappointed the expectations of the President who appointed them.

The only lasting solution is comprehensive reform legislation. Who knows, perhaps a thumping GOP loss in 2016, even if the Republicans hang on to diminished majority in the House, will terrify them enough to induce them to approve something.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Democrats need to HAMMER this over and over again so that the Hispanic community BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #1
I think Hispanics already get it BCD, but realmirage Jun 2016 #2
That's "DemocratIC" truebluegreen Jun 2016 #3
Democrat is fine in that context, in my opinion. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #6
Without Jeb! et al purging voters, truebluegreen Jun 2016 #9
You're willing to go to super lengths to completely minimize Nader's spoiler role. realmirage Jun 2016 #11
Not interested in changing your mind, truebluegreen Jun 2016 #13
There's a site for deniers like you, and it's not here. realmirage Jun 2016 #15
He didn't say Democratic voters. He said Democrat. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #16
yelp, maybe you are right-- truebluegreen Jun 2016 #18
The OP's consistent. Igel Jun 2016 #22
This Igel dude is smart realmirage Jun 2016 #27
No it hasn't been debunked. realmirage Jun 2016 #8
You must not have been listening closely then. truebluegreen Jun 2016 #10
Keep it up and you'll be stuck at some other shitty echo chamber where others have ended up realmirage Jun 2016 #12
My, my--that sounded like a threat. truebluegreen Jun 2016 #17
Nader apologists won't get sympathy here. There are other sites that are more receptive to realmirage Jun 2016 #19
And you know this how? truebluegreen Jun 2016 #20
I'm sure if you use Google, you'll find plenty of sites where people throw their votes away on realmirage Jun 2016 #21
I hear you, realmirage. I hear you. But let's not assume that Hispanics "already get it" and continu BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #24
Ain't that the truth realmirage Jun 2016 #26
This should be a major campaign issue Texano78704 Jun 2016 #4
I wonder if they're waiting until the general fully heats up to start throwing everything at Trump realmirage Jun 2016 #7
It's not just trump Texano78704 Jun 2016 #28
This is apparently an interim decision that didn't kill the policy. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #5
Your clarification is a good one. realmirage Jun 2016 #14
Thanks for your kind words, but I somewhat disagree with your follow-up Jim Lane Jun 2016 #23
Yes realmirage Jun 2016 #25
The GOP has pissed off everyone who is not a white male Christian. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court kills Obama...»Reply #23