Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(132,186 posts)

4. in searching for when Boulder started considering our furry friends as companions, rather than

Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:33 PM

Jun 2016

property (which is what pets are considered to be in most jurisdictions), I came across this very interesting (and lengthy!!) article:

https://www.animallaw.info/article/fido-seeks-full-membership-family-dismantling-property-classification-companion-animals

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This Oregon court cast just majorly changed the rights of pets � yes, pets [View all] meow2u3 Jun 2016 OP

The beginning of the end of the petriarchy? n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #1

sarcasm not appreciated. ciaobaby Jun 2016 #6

What sarcasm? Orrex Jun 2016 #7