Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Please help me out. The term-du-jour now seems to "neoliberal" [View all]CentralMass
(16,993 posts)23. A related article.
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376
"The main points of neo-liberalism include:
THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle. No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital, goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and "trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very much.
CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for business.
DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could diminsh profits, including protecting the environmentand safety on the job.
PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed, privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs.
ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as "lazy."
"The main points of neo-liberalism include:
THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle. No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital, goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and "trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very much.
CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for business.
DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could diminsh profits, including protecting the environmentand safety on the job.
PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed, privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs.
ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as "lazy."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Please help me out. The term-du-jour now seems to "neoliberal" [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
OP
Maybe it's just that some of you are just now noticing other people talking about it?
Scootaloo
Jun 2016
#76
Many people use it as a derogatory diss du jour to describe a pol without knowing what it really
brush
Jun 2016
#66
Because those ideas have been put into place worldwide, some places more, some places less
Warpy
Jun 2016
#7
It's a way to divide us, which is precisely antithetical to what being progressive is about.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#8
it's moving public $$ to private: think Soc Sec, charter schools, pensions
George Eliot
Jun 2016
#74
Anybody who uses that term against a fellow DUer is engaging in a personal attack.
MohRokTah
Jun 2016
#10
It is a game for a few here, they take a term they find offensive and marginalize it
Rex
Jun 2016
#59
That which the US calls 'neoconservative' most of the world calls 'neoliberal'.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#14
My comment was not intended to be an exact definition of the term but a fun way to point out why
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#22
I've written diaries using and explaining the term for tears. Just because YOU just noticed the term
arendt
Jun 2016
#32
Just because YOU used the term for a year is no reason I should have seen it.
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
#52
It's a term the populist left use to conflate the establishment left and the establishment right.
Donald Ian Rankin
Jun 2016
#42
Seemed to appear as a smear word the last few days before GE mode kicked in.
emulatorloo
Jun 2016
#64
That's what I'm thinking, too. Plus, there was the matter of the word's usage.
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
#65