Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Please help me out. The term-du-jour now seems to "neoliberal" [View all]countryjake
(8,554 posts)27. Catapulted to where? Do you mean here, Europe, the entire globe, or on DU?
Beyond Neoliberalism Lies Opportunity for Grand Restructuring ~ by David Kotz ~ May 04, 2015
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/05/04/beyond-neoliberalism-lies-opportunity-grand-restructuring
.....
With this history in mind, what might emerge today? If history repeats itself, there may be another round of restructuring within the bounds of a capitalist system. One possible version would be a new nationalist and statist form of capitalism that brings renewed economic expansion and stability while maintaining employers' currently dominant position in the labor market, a development that would not be favorable for the majority. If the labor movement and other popular movements gain strength, the prospect of a new form of regulated capitalism based on capital-labor compromise may arise. Big business becomes willing to compromise only when threatened by a growing progressive movement.
Either of the above directions of change could lead to another long period of economic expansion which, while good for job creation, would accelerate the global climate change that is threatening the survival of civilization. Any effective form of capitalism requires, and produces, increasing production of commodities, a process that is no longer compatible with an environment of fixed resources.
Any form of restructuring takes time, and while it proceeds continuing stagnation is likely to eventually spur the growth of popular movements that question whether capitalism itself can any longer meet the needs of the majority. The endless profit drive of capitalism leads to ever increasing production of commodities regardless of human needs and regardless of the environmental consequences. The rebirth of a socialist movement would offer an alternative a democratic participatory planned economy that could bring a period of rising human welfare for all in an environmentally sustainable manner.
No economic law dictates the outcome in a period of structural crisis of capitalism such as prevails today. While some form of restructuring is on the agenda, the direction of change reactionary, reformist, or radical will be determined by the struggles among various groups in the context of an ongoing economic crisis. How this plays out in the coming years will decide the economic and political future for some time to come.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/05/04/beyond-neoliberalism-lies-opportunity-grand-restructuring
.....
With this history in mind, what might emerge today? If history repeats itself, there may be another round of restructuring within the bounds of a capitalist system. One possible version would be a new nationalist and statist form of capitalism that brings renewed economic expansion and stability while maintaining employers' currently dominant position in the labor market, a development that would not be favorable for the majority. If the labor movement and other popular movements gain strength, the prospect of a new form of regulated capitalism based on capital-labor compromise may arise. Big business becomes willing to compromise only when threatened by a growing progressive movement.
Either of the above directions of change could lead to another long period of economic expansion which, while good for job creation, would accelerate the global climate change that is threatening the survival of civilization. Any effective form of capitalism requires, and produces, increasing production of commodities, a process that is no longer compatible with an environment of fixed resources.
Any form of restructuring takes time, and while it proceeds continuing stagnation is likely to eventually spur the growth of popular movements that question whether capitalism itself can any longer meet the needs of the majority. The endless profit drive of capitalism leads to ever increasing production of commodities regardless of human needs and regardless of the environmental consequences. The rebirth of a socialist movement would offer an alternative a democratic participatory planned economy that could bring a period of rising human welfare for all in an environmentally sustainable manner.
No economic law dictates the outcome in a period of structural crisis of capitalism such as prevails today. While some form of restructuring is on the agenda, the direction of change reactionary, reformist, or radical will be determined by the struggles among various groups in the context of an ongoing economic crisis. How this plays out in the coming years will decide the economic and political future for some time to come.
I'd imagine that a number of thinking people who have lived thru these long decades of neoliberalism are also aware that our planet's changing climate and the survival of the masses of people, working people, and every other living thing on earth might just hinge on the fix that is made to this crumbling capitalism the world spins on.
You, yourself, may not have noticed it, but members of DU have been discussing it since the site's inception.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Please help me out. The term-du-jour now seems to "neoliberal" [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
OP
Maybe it's just that some of you are just now noticing other people talking about it?
Scootaloo
Jun 2016
#76
Many people use it as a derogatory diss du jour to describe a pol without knowing what it really
brush
Jun 2016
#66
Because those ideas have been put into place worldwide, some places more, some places less
Warpy
Jun 2016
#7
It's a way to divide us, which is precisely antithetical to what being progressive is about.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#8
it's moving public $$ to private: think Soc Sec, charter schools, pensions
George Eliot
Jun 2016
#74
Anybody who uses that term against a fellow DUer is engaging in a personal attack.
MohRokTah
Jun 2016
#10
It is a game for a few here, they take a term they find offensive and marginalize it
Rex
Jun 2016
#59
That which the US calls 'neoconservative' most of the world calls 'neoliberal'.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#14
My comment was not intended to be an exact definition of the term but a fun way to point out why
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#22
I've written diaries using and explaining the term for tears. Just because YOU just noticed the term
arendt
Jun 2016
#32
Just because YOU used the term for a year is no reason I should have seen it.
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
#52
It's a term the populist left use to conflate the establishment left and the establishment right.
Donald Ian Rankin
Jun 2016
#42
Seemed to appear as a smear word the last few days before GE mode kicked in.
emulatorloo
Jun 2016
#64
That's what I'm thinking, too. Plus, there was the matter of the word's usage.
Stinky The Clown
Jun 2016
#65