Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)On Eve of SCOTUS Abortion Decision, Texas Accused of Suppressing Key Data [View all]
The Supreme Court is expected on Monday to announce its decision on Texas' abortion law, in what could be the most consequential ruling on the issue in a generation. The question: Do new requirements on abortion providers pose an unconstitutional "undue burden" on Texas women?
But among the reams of evidence presented to the high court and the public debate in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, something is still missing: A full, official account of the initial impact of the law on Texas women.
A state employee with knowledge of the annual data Texas collects on abortion spoke to NBC News and is accusing state officials overseeing the Department of Health Services of intentionally blocking the information and instructing staff members to mislead people who ask for it. Because fact-finding traditionally ends after such a case goes to trial, long before it reaches the Supreme Court, the justices may or may not have considered it. But in the court of public opinion, the data could potentially undermine Texas' official argument that its requirements pose no particular burden on women.
First catapulted to the national stage by then-state Sen. Wendy Davis' pink-sneakered filibuster, the law has a bundle of abortion restrictions. Local abortion clinics have asked the Supreme Court to block two of the rules: that doctors performing abortions have admitting privileges at local hospitals and that even early procedures, including "medication abortions" that involve only taking two pills, take place in expensive ambulatory surgical centers.
Saying they are unable to comply with the admitting privileges provision in one border town, McAllen, no hospital would even send abortion providers an application about half of the clinics in Texas have already closed since 2013. If the Supreme Court allows the other requirement to go into effect, only nine or 10 clinics will be left in a state with 5.4 million women of reproductive age. '
<snip>
read:http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/eve-supreme-court-abortion-decision-texas-accused-suppressing-key-data-n598071
I urge you to read the whole story. The details are damning.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On Eve of SCOTUS Abortion Decision, Texas Accused of Suppressing Key Data [View all]
cali
Jun 2016
OP
It is still important to me. The election is sucking all the air out of the room.
alfredo
Jun 2016
#30
That's right. Seems DUers don't care about laws that target WOMEN for extreme suffering, even DEATH
BlancheSplanchnik
Jun 2016
#8
This DU feminist cares a lot about women having the ability to control their reproduction.
lark
Jun 2016
#18
It has been a real distraction from important issues such as women's rights and the environment.
alfredo
Jun 2016
#31
This Texas statute was the entire reason for Wendy Davis to make her famous filibuster and
no_hypocrisy
Jun 2016
#4
we are now understanding why there are only eight justices currently on the scotus
spanone
Jun 2016
#7
I do the same thing, only classic literature and poetry don't figure in,
BlancheSplanchnik
Jun 2016
#57
FWIIW I think The Hype about Trump and Brexit took up much of the headlines here.
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2016
#34