Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DID YOU KNOW? Texas has the power to put another 8 Republicans into the US Senate? [View all]truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)27. No.
"The most likely possibility that Texas might be split into more than one state was headed off in 1850. California (recently acquired by the U.S in the war with Mexico) had approved a free-state constitution and petitioned Congress for statehood; meanwhile, Texans were engaged in a border dispute, claiming that their territory included half of present-day New Mexico and part of Colorado. Had the boundary issue been decided in favor of Texas, southerners might have pushed to create a second state out of the larger Texas territory in order to balance California's admission as a free state. The series of congressional bills collectively known as the Compromise of 1850 (temporarily) settled these troublesome issues by admitting California as a free state and giving Texas $10 million to relinquish its territorial claims, while the pro-slavery section supported these proposals in exchange for the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act.
The issue of the 36°30'N slavery demarcation line soon became moot when the Missouri Compromise was effectively repealed by the 1854 passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and explicitly ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court's 1857 Dred Scott decision. Any real likelihood that Texas might be carved up into additional states was ended when Texas seceded from the Union in 1861, joined the side of the Confederacy in the Civil War, and was not formally re-admitted to the U.S. until after the 1865 ratification of the 13th amendment which abolished slavery throughout the jurisdiction of the United States. "
But hey, by all means, do get Texass to take this to the Supremes: it may keep them busy and out of our hair for awhile.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DID YOU KNOW? Texas has the power to put another 8 Republicans into the US Senate? [View all]
MohRokTah
Jun 2016
OP
Also, the governor, the state 'board' members with their gubernatorial appointments, and the
MADem
Jun 2016
#7
I bet few pockets, like around Dallas, Southlake, McKinney, etc, would love to have their own state.
Ilsa
Jun 2016
#10
That's what the 1 March 1845 annexation law said but not what the 30 March 1870 law says.
struggle4progress
Jun 2016
#11
There's no real point in revisiting this: the issue has been moot for over 150 years
struggle4progress
Jun 2016
#21
The Congress gave pre-approval to any plan devised by the TX legislature in the legislation...
MohRokTah
Jun 2016
#20
Congress gave its consent with the legislation admitting TX as a state in 1845.
MohRokTah
Jun 2016
#25
It's an open question if that ended with secession. It wasn't included in any agreement
HereSince1628
Jun 2016
#52
None of which matters a plugged nickel until a case comes to the Court: the definition of "moot."
truebluegreen
Jun 2016
#43
That agreement was between the Repulic of of Texas and the United States; it became null and void
LongtimeAZDem
Jun 2016
#44
Yes the right to secede was in their statehood but they did secede at the Civil War
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#51
No, the right to secede was never in the admission legislation, that's a myth.
MohRokTah
Jun 2016
#53
When first admitted as a state Texas had the right to secede, they did and became a part
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#59