Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
25. I would add AT&T Mobility v Concepcion.
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:53 AM
Jun 2012

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/att-mobility-v-concepcion/

Holding: California state contract law, which deems class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unenforceable when certain criteria are met, is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act because it stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.

Plain English Holding: Under the Federal Arbitration Act, California must enforce arbitration agreements even if the agreement requires that consumer complaints be arbitrated individually (instead of on a class-action basis).

Judgment: Ninth Circuit Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on April 27, 2011. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor.

I would also add the case about the police who lost track of a crack dealer who ran into an apartment complex. The police didn't know where he was, but claimed to have smelled marijuana and heard the sound of evidence being destroyed, so they entered an apartment and arrested the people inside (not the crack dealer.) The SCOTUS found that action to be constitutional.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4th Scary Decision by SCOTUS no_hypocrisy Jun 2012 #1
+1. nt OnyxCollie Jun 2012 #14
Really puts the idiocy to "Why should I vote for Obama?" JNelson6563 Jun 2012 #2
The Supreme Court is not a valid argument for re-election. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #3
In 2000 people didn't think it was an issue and as a result we got Roberts and Alito. libinnyandia Jun 2012 #8
And people thought it mattered in 2008, but we got Elena Kagan. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #16
If McCain had won we would have a 7-2 right wing majority on the Court and who knows what libinnyandia Jun 2012 #23
And right now we have a court with Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #26
Moderates are better than conservatives. They are not crazy. If Romney gets in he will appoint libinnyandia Jun 2012 #28
But they're not better than liberals. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #29
Obama does not = Romney. libinnyandia Jun 2012 #30
No. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #36
We got Alito & Roberts because of the betrayal by the "Centrist" Democrats. bvar22 Jun 2012 #39
We got Roberts and Alito in part because the left was divided. Too many thought that it didn't libinnyandia Jun 2012 #40
Agree JonLP24 Jun 2012 #9
Wrong. You can't be sure about Obama caseymoz Jun 2012 #10
I'd like to think so. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #17
But you'll agree it's a better bet than Romney. caseymoz Jun 2012 #41
You see, that's the problem. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #42
Romney of 1994 was close to Bush I caseymoz Jun 2012 #43
And you can't see the difference between Kagan and Alito? treestar Jun 2012 #31
On my most important issue right now? Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #33
BullSHIT. Zoeisright Jun 2012 #32
Kagan may not overturn Roe v. Wade Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #34
And thank you for using "man" Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #35
I'm of two minds here Creideiki Jun 2012 #37
I completely disagree JNelson6563 Jun 2012 #38
Obama, who sent attorneys to SC to argue FOR strip searches woo me with science Jun 2012 #20
hmm... chervilant Jun 2012 #4
i don't know -- it's working for me. nt xchrom Jun 2012 #7
Nope chervilant Jun 2012 #13
Yeah, link isn't working skydive forever Jun 2012 #5
it's working for me. nt xchrom Jun 2012 #6
Link gives me nothing joeglow3 Jun 2012 #11
i've put the link in again -- it works for me -- if more say link doesn't work i will delete. nt xchrom Jun 2012 #12
Works for me. Hatchling Jun 2012 #18
ok -- cool. nt xchrom Jun 2012 #19
that may be the problem hfojvt Jun 2012 #27
K&R. nt OnyxCollie Jun 2012 #15
DU Rec. nt woo me with science Jun 2012 #21
Link is good. "As scary as these three decisions are, they’re merely a warm-up pampango Jun 2012 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author OnyxCollie Jun 2012 #24
I would add AT&T Mobility v Concepcion. OnyxCollie Jun 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»3 Scary Decisions Handed ...»Reply #25