Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
12. Is that really clear from the evidence in the brief story?
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jun 2016

Even under Texas law which is unusual in that it names mental disorders that are disqualifying under state law, it's not clear what is meant by a mental crisis. There is no mention at all that a diagnosis was made. It might have been, but it might not have been for conditions listed inside of Texas law. So it's unclear if a mental diagnosis could be found on background check.

Federally, 3 things specifically about mental illness could put a person on the prohibited purchase list to be found by a background check an adjudication by the court or appointed representatives of a court that a person was dangerous to self or others, an involuntary commitment because a person is dangerous to self or others, and acceptance by the court of a defense of not guilty by reason of insanity. If those things don't exist, a record in NICS wouldn't exist for a background check to detect.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas Mom Who Killed 2 Da...»Reply #12