Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,844 posts)
17. minor mandate was needed
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 02:35 PM
Jun 2016

Cameron should've made the referendum subject to a 'minor mandate', since belonging to the EU was such an entrenched & historical british policy for 40 years. Leaving the vote to a simple majority made it susceptible to whims & caprices of an angered electorate, which was likely just temporal.
A minor mandate of 52.5% to 47.5% would've kept UK in EU (21 to 19 votes); Even 52 to 48 (26 to 24).
A minor mandate of 5 out of 9 is better imo, or 55.55% to 44.44%, to overturn an existing policy on a referendum. It's not a popularity contest, when it comes down to overturning existing policy to the whims of a momentary lapse in judgement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The EU will treat Britain...»Reply #17