asssault rifle ban for those on terror watch list - at least

[jimmy the one]

12. reread the OP, you argue a different topic

crepuscular: So it's ok to deny due process just a little bit?

Yes, it's the price to pay for somehow getting on a terrorist watch list, whether valid or accidental.
Banning suspect terrorists from being able to purchase assault rifles which comprise ~4% of national gunstock is hardly infringing on any alleged right, since they could go to a firearm dealer & purchase any other conventional firearm - I gather this is what you & the nra argue for, inadvertently, those on terrorist watch lists being able to arm themselves.
The benefits in prevention would be worth the inconveniencing of some legal beagles.

Secondly, Assault Weapon Bans are unlikely to save a single life, all they do is spur companies to create work-arounds and spur an increase in weapon sales.

This has nowt to do with the ban I suggested, for suspect terrorists. I suggest you reread the OP. You suggest an absurdity that smith & wesson would try to work around an assault rifle ban to suspect terrorists. A couple terrorists could do that number of gun murders in a few nights, with an AR15.

Unless you are somehow going to confiscate tens of millions of weapons and maybe a billion or so high capacity magazines, any AWB style attempts are highly unlikely to save a single one of the several hundred people a year killed with these types of weapons.

Do reread the OP, you are arguing something which is not being discussed.

Someone crazed enough to kill dozens of people could do so equally effectively with readily available weapons such as this, which is fully compliant with every AWB that has been implemented or suggested.

How much does your pictured firearm weigh? what is the recoil? what weight bullet?