Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(16,974 posts)

16. Yep they must be very dangerous to be on the list

Mon Jun 27, 2016, 04:12 PM

Jun 2016

If they should not be able to fly or have a weapon, they are to dangerous to be loose to do other things.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

asssault rifle ban for those on terror watch list - at least [View all] jimmy the one Jun 2016 OP

I don't hear those against safeinOhio Jun 2016 #1

My fix is sarisataka Jun 2016 #7

Yep they must be very dangerous to be on the list Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #16

Makes more sense than a ban for the No-Fly List. n/t 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #2

That would be a good start mwrguy Jun 2016 #3

... Crepuscular Jun 2016 #4

reread the OP, you argue a different topic jimmy the one Jun 2016 #12

... Crepuscular Jun 2016 #19

sooo you want to ban their purchase of a gun used in 11% of mass shootings Press Virginia Jun 2016 #5

thank you for your support jimmy the one Jun 2016 #13

a 10% improvement would save roughly 2 lives Press Virginia Jun 2016 #14

Assault rifles are already banned for all intents and purposes. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #6

just like the woman in the San Bernadino shooting did Press Virginia Jun 2016 #10

Fortunately that is already illegal. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #18

Will all true citizens sarisataka Jun 2016 #11

Nah. Igel Jun 2016 #15