Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
37. If anger issues cause you to commit a crime you should not be allowed access to weapons, period.
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jun 2016

And I say that as somebody who is generally pro-gun.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #1
This ruling will directly save women's lives. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #2
As a DA survivor, I know this firsthand. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #7
AND men's. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2016 #18
Phil Hartman... :( n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #26
This means the SCOTUS is reaffirming the right of government to regulate guns. roamer65 Jun 2016 #3
Yup. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #6
Slight Distinction-This Was a Violation of Federal Law After Being Convicted of a State Law Stallion Jun 2016 #25
Nobody said otherwise. Igel Jun 2016 #36
Not quite. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #4
Wow, two big wins on one day... Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #5
This one is not getting enough coverage n/t malaise Jun 2016 #33
Yeah, but arguably it is a fairly narrow case... Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #35
There is yet hope for this country Hekate Jun 2016 #8
"two of the SCOTUS justices are complete morons" - Sonia Sotomayor is a "complete moron" really? n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #9
Ok, not "Complete" AllTooEasy Jun 2016 #12
That's still a bizarre assessment. Orrex Jun 2016 #20
What was Sotomayor's rationale for her dissent? n/t backscatter712 Jun 2016 #39
A good day for SCOTUS decisions mcar Jun 2016 #10
Oh happy day! lark Jun 2016 #11
SCOTUS DIDN'T rule that People Convicted of Domestic Violence Can't Buy Guns Nitram Jun 2016 #13
You are wrong. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #14
Where are you seeing the constitutionality of the federal law being decided here? sl8 Jun 2016 #23
OOps, I see you are correct. Thanks for the correction. Nitram Jun 2016 #15
Not a problem, it's all good. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #16
Fantastic news. vintx Jun 2016 #17
and from the deepest hottest portion of hell the tormented scalia screams noooooooooooooooooooooooo dembotoz Jun 2016 #19
. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #21
Excellent libodem Jun 2016 #22
So Sotomayor is a "complete moron"? former9thward Jun 2016 #24
She isn't... but I do disagree with her on this one. FBaggins Jun 2016 #29
I'm sick of this binary view of the Justicies of SCOTUS. RAFisher Jun 2016 #31
The headline is not accurate. former9thward Jun 2016 #27
Nope. That isn't what they ruled FBaggins Jun 2016 #28
I agree with the decision, but let me play devils advocate still_one Jun 2016 #30
Now all they need to do is require a sanity test. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #32
Good news again! smirkymonkey Jun 2016 #34
If anger issues cause you to commit a crime you should not be allowed access to weapons, period. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #37
That isn't the case here FBaggins Jun 2016 #38
K&R (nt). Kurovski Jun 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Voisine v. US, SCOTUS ...»Reply #37