Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

surrealAmerican

(11,359 posts)

6. Won't this mainly benefit those graduates who were wealthier to begin with?

Reply to cali (Original post)

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 08:49 AM

Jun 2016

They're the ones who are more likely to have (or be able to borrow) the money to start a business.

What about people who borrowed and don't have the funds available to become "entrepreneurs"? - They're still stuck.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton to offer debt forgiveness to young entrepeneurs in the form of deferred [View all] cali Jun 2016 OP

We need to increase the scope here. peace13 Jun 2016 #1

If you would read the article ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #5

Link please to her comprehensive plan. peace13 Jun 2016 #7

Devil's in the details. seabeckind Jun 2016 #2

"Comcast in every home" n/t arcane1 Jun 2016 #12

Oh great... ljm2002 Jun 2016 #3

Very nice for "entrepreneurs" gratuitous Jun 2016 #4

Ancient notion? Igel Jun 2016 #9

No, it's not so ancient gratuitous Jun 2016 #15

Won't this mainly benefit those graduates who were wealthier to begin with? surrealAmerican Jun 2016 #6

That's very true My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #8

And recipients of venture capital, which is already a big enough problem. arcane1 Jun 2016 #13

Well, that will benefit like 10 people a year. TransitJohn Jun 2016 #10

So Joe Worker is stuck paying the bill but the capitalists gets a free ride? Sam_Fields Jun 2016 #11

Why only entrepreneurs? Why not scientists or teachers? alarimer Jun 2016 #14

Very weak tea. Disappointing, but far from surprising. nt vintx Jun 2016 #16

Not even ONE post in defense of this proposal. arcane1 Jun 2016 #17

Awkwardly worded and misleading title. hughee99 Jun 2016 #18