Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
17. ''What would Goldman think?''
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 08:31 AM
Jun 2016

Joseph Stiglitz called Larry Summers out.



Larry Summers: Goldman Sacked

By Greg Palast
Reader Supported News, September 16, 2013

Joseph Stiglitz couldn't believe his ears. Here they were in the White House, with President Bill Clinton asking the chiefs of the US Treasury for guidance on the life and death of America's economy, when the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers turns to his boss, Secretary Robert Rubin, and says, "What would Goldman think of that?"

Huh?

Then, at another meeting, Summers said it again: What would Goldman think?

A shocked Stiglitz, then Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisors, told me he'd turned to Summers, and asked if Summers thought it appropriate to decide US economic policy based on "what Goldman thought." As opposed to say, the facts, or say, the needs of the American public, you know, all that stuff that we heard in Cabinet meetings on The West Wing.

Summers looked at Stiglitz like Stiglitz was some kind of naive fool who'd read too many civics books.

CONTINUED...

http://www.gregpalast.com/larry-summers-goldman-sacked/



Then, the truth doesn't matter as much as the money.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Stiglitz is wrong, IMO. eom MohRokTah Jun 2016 #1
Care to explain this, or just lob a one sentence bomb and disappear? Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #6
one sentence bombs DonCoquixote Jun 2016 #9
MohRokTah means "hit and run" in some language. HughBeaumont Jun 2016 #12
OK, so you think he's wrong, but ... nikto Jun 2016 #7
Well my goodness, if you say so... ljm2002 Jun 2016 #16
Stiglitz is right. PatrickforO Jun 2016 #2
Excellent analysis The Second Stone Jun 2016 #3
Those same ISDS provisions have been in worldwide trade agreements since 1959. Suddenly, they are Hoyt Jun 2016 #10
Apparently the provisions go further now, with these latest "partnerships". ronnie624 Jun 2016 #19
What does he know? avaistheone1 Jun 2016 #4
But Obama supports it completely, so it has to be the bee's knees Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #5
Has anyone noticed how the "Pro-TPP" side NEVER makes actual arguments with support info/evidence? nikto Jun 2016 #8
yep, they never do, the most you will get out of them is that they call you "anti" trade AntiBank Jun 2016 #15
Agreed! nikto Jun 2016 #21
Yet Canada asked to be part of the TPP because they -- like most countries -- know investment Hoyt Jun 2016 #11
yes, governments of nations are always looking out for cali Jun 2016 #13
Yep, they are all corrupt trying to ensure there are enough funds for healthcare, education, Hoyt Jun 2016 #14
''What would Goldman think?'' Octafish Jun 2016 #17
Obama's argument for TPP: Take my word for it. earthshine Jun 2016 #18
K&R (nt). Kurovski Jun 2016 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TPP 'worst trade deal eve...»Reply #17