Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 09:53 AM Jun 2016

Supreme Court rejects pharmacists' religious rights appeal [View all]



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is allowing Washington state to require pharmacies to dispense Plan B or other emergency contraceptives, rejecting an appeal from pharmacists who said they have religious objections to providing the drugs.

The justices' order on Tuesday leaves in place rules first adopted in 2007 following reports that some women had been denied access to emergency contraceptives that are effective when taken within a few days of unprotected sex. Pharmacies must fill lawful prescriptions, but individual pharmacists with moral objections can refer patients to another pharmacist at the same store.

A Ralph's Thriftway pharmacy in Olympia, Washington, and two pharmacists sued, saying the rules required them to violate their religious beliefs.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas said they would have heard the appeal.

http://bigstory.ap.org/05b49047c451448aace27430c01fc04a

Roberts and the RW'ers must be getting soooo frustrated.....
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
more good news surrealAmerican Jun 2016 #1
I'm sorry you're bleeding to death but my religion doesn't allow stiching wounds Sam_Fields Jun 2016 #2
Are women's mercuryblues Jun 2016 #3
So I said in another thread. Seems the female justices are Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #4
Wow. Orrex Jun 2016 #5
We are really beginning to see what kind of influence a religious, activist smirkymonkey Jun 2016 #6
You mean the justice from opus dei? Raster Jun 2016 #7
You Nailed It! ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #11
Yes, and actively thumbed his nose AT ANYONE that would/could question his motives... Raster Jun 2016 #16
Good Riddance, Indeed! ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #29
Looks like Ralph's Thriftway in Olympia Washington will have a couple openings rurallib Jun 2016 #8
There's Always Barber College ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #12
College?! Barber or clown? 47of74 Jun 2016 #22
Unfortunately, there are many Catholic hospitals for them to go to. Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #14
sort of looking like the strategy of not confirming a new justice rurallib Jun 2016 #9
And I am hoping that come Janaury it'll be EX Senator Grassley. 47of74 Jun 2016 #23
are we finally seeing some sanity coming out of scotus when it comes to women's rights? niyad Jun 2016 #10
It's been a sucky week in court skepticscott Jun 2016 #13
That's odd gratuitous Jun 2016 #15
In the Robetrts court Corporations > people TeamPooka Jun 2016 #19
Individuals can still practice their religious beliefs under this ruling SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #32
Another great decision mcar Jun 2016 #17
Haha do your job. TeamPooka Jun 2016 #18
Thank heavens... tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #20
Yeah do your goddamn job pharmacists or find a new field. 47of74 Jun 2016 #21
Individual pharmacists still don't have to dispense drugs they find objectionable SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #24
Kicking this bad boy back up REP Jun 2016 #25
Excellent!!! K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #26
As it should be. Thank you SC. riversedge Jun 2016 #27
Then get a different job. AllyCat Jun 2016 #28
Scalia's dead & gone, & there's 3 women on the Court. Tra la, tra la, tra la. Hekate Jun 2016 #30
Kick Hekate Jun 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court rejects pha...