Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Free Trade" is a SCAM. It always has been. [View all]Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)4. Anything Trump is for , I'm against!
While many viewers may have been sympathetic to Coopers allegation of opportunism, there is no reason to doubt Clintons account of her position on trade. It would be foolish to think that because she had once supported the TPP in principle, she should remain committed to it unconditionally. Furthermore, Clintons longer record shows an increasing reluctance to support the free trade agenda that characterized her husbands administration twenty years ago. While she has supported many past free trade agreements, she voted against the Central American Free Trade Area (CAFTA) in 2005, while she was a senator. In 2007, reflecting on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), she offered mixed support, explaining, what we have learned is that we have to drive a tougher bargain. By 2008, she had concluded that NAFTA had not lived up to its promises. Later that year, she broke with members of her own campaign team and her husband over a free trade agreement with Colombia.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-singh-grewal/why-hillary-clinton-is-ri_b_8295420.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sweden trades more than twice as we do. Their unions are strong. Their wages are high.
pampango
Jun 2016
#2
How do they have positive trade balances without tariffs and with high wages and strong unions?
pampango
Jun 2016
#51
Also because wealthy corporations have gotten wealthy exporting jobs to other countries and then
Akamai
Jun 2016
#73
Yup/ Free Market Job Creation, Bedford Falls: 'It's a Wonderful Life' GOP Version.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#77
I'm sure you are right. They expect more from their government and "are more than willing
pampango
Jun 2016
#50
VAT applies to both imports and domestic products. Tariffs only apply to imports.
pampango
Jun 2016
#49
So applying a VAT (say 20%) to both imports and domestic products levels the playing field?
pampango
Jun 2016
#58
The Swedish VAT raises the cost of a Swedish-made car by assessing incremental increases at each
pampango
Jun 2016
#60
Just because Trump stopped thinking doesn't mean Democrats should. No automatic positions, pls. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2016
#10
And the latest ones are mainly about proving more power and leverage to big corporations
n2doc
Jun 2016
#15
Yep. The US would be a better place if all 50 states could impose tariffs on trade with each other.
Nye Bevan
Jun 2016
#56
There's no such thing as free trade. Some people lose big time ... WORKERS
Zen Democrat
Jun 2016
#74