General Discussion

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)

18. And ethics. They couldn't be more dissimilar.

Wed Jun 29, 2016, 11:40 AM

Jun 2016

But if she starts flying around to secret meetings with very wealthy people like the court's most outstanding conservative revisionist did, we really shouldn't wait for her to drop dread to notice.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN: Is Sotomayor the new Scalia? [View all] Renew Deal Jun 2016 OP

No ... Sotomayor is faithful to stari decisius. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #1

stare... n/t xocet Jun 2016 #32

Oops, auto-correct. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #36

Misleading title. bjobotts Jun 2016 #42

Please Sonia has a brain...they're not at all similar...nt joeybee12 Jun 2016 #2

And ethics. They couldn't be more dissimilar. Hortensis Jun 2016 #18

Also, she has read and studied the constitution... joeybee12 Jun 2016 #33

Exactly. Not the one he felt should be the real one Hortensis Jun 2016 #35

Scalia had a brain wryter2000 Jun 2016 #48

She also has a heart (n/t) PJMcK Jun 2016 #53

Is Sotomayor a self-important asshole with a god complex? Orrex Jun 2016 #3

+1000. Paladin Jun 2016 #4

I continue to celebrate his death with each rising sun. Orrex Jun 2016 #6

My sentiments exactly. (nt) Paladin Jun 2016 #17

Justice Ginsberg does not share your sentiment yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #83

I can respect RBG without sharing her opinion of Scalia. (nt) Paladin Jun 2016 #84

Me too. irisblue Jun 2016 #29

You are going to upset the faint of heart here... Human101948 Jun 2016 #31

I don't think that I could make that outfit work for me Orrex Jun 2016 #45

I apologize if I'm not understanding the context CheRan Jun 2016 #71

Well, I don't jump up and dance around the room Hortensis Jun 2016 #37

Do you think that Scalia was the reason they settled? Human101948 Jun 2016 #73

same here. nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #39

+1 tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #68

+1000! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #14

CNN lost on Jeopardy. Rex Jun 2016 #82

Up yours CNN 47of74 Jun 2016 #5

+1 Johonny Jun 2016 #7

+ 1 lsewpershad Jun 2016 #23

+ 1000 BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #27

That was my initial reaction, too PJMcK Jun 2016 #57

on facebook there was another post about liberal media...and then i see crap like this dembotoz Jun 2016 #8

All I have to say is she's a great pick. Kudos to her, and to Obama for picking her. brush Jun 2016 #9

ITA!!! (eom) StevieM Jun 2016 #49

ITA? Don't know that one. brush Jun 2016 #60

ITA means "I totally agree." And eom means "end of message." (eom) StevieM Jun 2016 #70

Even asking that question (CNN) is an insult to Sotomayor IMHO Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #10

Maybe, but it is framed in a complimentary way. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #11

If CNN is complimenting her Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #12

Although I agree with you Renew Deal Jun 2016 #15

I call it "praising her with faint damns...." Feck 'em. n/t TygrBright Jun 2016 #24

Ah, the fucking false equivalence game again n2doc Jun 2016 #13

I actually think Alito is worse Renew Deal Jun 2016 #16

Gotta Disagree, RD ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #19

Funny Renew Deal Jun 2016 #25

true NewJeffCT Jun 2016 #20

Or, the sometimes humourous wit. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #44

I could post that on FB & shake up the day. CrispyQ Jun 2016 #40

Someone once said, Alito is Scalia lite.. mountain grammy Jun 2016 #62

Nope, she's not...but Liberalagogo Jun 2016 #21

CNN is Pox news in a cheap disguise The Wizard Jun 2016 #75

Is CNN a news channel? BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #22

CNN, lol: my, what depths they've come to plumb. closeupready Jun 2016 #26

I think she's the new Marshall. hollowdweller Jun 2016 #28

You've got to be kidding. klook Jun 2016 #30

No. False equivalency is false. Politicub Jun 2016 #34

Precisely. False Equivalncy is the false god of MSM. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #38

What a pile! lark Jun 2016 #41

Rah rah! Hulk Jun 2016 #65

He was a partisan hack who argued opposing views of the same law depending on who was POTUS. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #80

UGH ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #43

I see what they mean treestar Jun 2016 #46

No. malthaussen Jun 2016 #47

Sonia Sotomayer is IMO the best justice appointed the court in the last 60 years since Brennan StevieM Jun 2016 #50

Well, no. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #51

What a stupid headline. "They're exactly the same, in that they're total opposites!" Svafa Jun 2016 #52

CNN Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #55

As news professionals know, many people read ONLY headlines. So, CNN's headline is an attempt to merrily Jun 2016 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #56

My headline... Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #58

What an insult to a fine jurist mcar Jun 2016 #59

Is CNN the new Faux? benld74 Jun 2016 #61

Sotomayor is a far far better jurist than Scalia ever hoped to be. nt Hekate Jun 2016 #63

Is CNN a cesspool of innuendo groveling for viewers? Xipe Totec Jun 2016 #64

CNN: The Place for False Equivalencies. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #66

Except that she isn't bat-shit insane AwakeAtLast Jun 2016 #67

it is insulting to compare her to Scalia Skittles Jun 2016 #69

Certainly Not News lives up to its moniker yet again Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #72

Scalia perverted the law The Wizard Jun 2016 #74

Well, to play devils advocate. frankieallen Jun 2016 #76

You are incorrect bluejaylane Jun 2016 #77

I don't think Scalia was a great legal mind so much as he was kind of a Zig Zigler bs master of Todays_Illusion Jun 2016 #78

As someone has already mentioned it's a misleading title n/t lordsummerisle Jun 2016 #79

The general response to this OP is about as odd as it gets Renew Deal Jun 2016 #81

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #85