Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Renew Deal

(84,855 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 11:04 AM Jun 2016

Conservative Justices Bemoan Court's Future [View all]

Even after all of the opinions had been handed down, the Supreme Court term ended with yet another rebuke by the court's conservatives, having been deserted by their sometimes-ally Justice Anthony Kennedy in another politically charged case. Led by Justice Samuel Alito, the right-leaning justices repeatedly sounded a dark note about the court's future.

Kennedy, who this week was the deciding vote in leading the court to definitively strike down Texas's abortion restrictions, infuriated the court's three conservatives again by refusing to even take up a case pitting pharmacies' religious objections against access to contraception.

Alito responded with a glum dissent — just as he did in the abortion case, Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, and in last week's affirmative action case, where Kennedy's vote also swung the result in favor of existing programs.

"This case is an ominous sign," Alito wrote in an unusual, 15-page response to the court refusing to hear Stormans v. Wiesman, leaving in place a Washington state requirement for pharmacies to stock emergency contraception. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas joined him. It takes four votes for the court to hear a case.

"If this is a sign of how religious liberty claims will be treated in the years ahead," Alito continued, sounding a lot like a man who foresees a bleak future for his side, "those who value religious freedom have cause for great concern."
<snip>

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/conservative-justices-bemoan-court-s-future-n600741

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It might be in his best interest to consider retirement. n/t cloudbase Jun 2016 #1
(Not to mention MurrayDelph Jun 2016 #25
Such hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty Hortensis Jun 2016 #26
tough shit.... dhill926 Jun 2016 #2
Boo hoo PJMcK Jun 2016 #3
I hope we get as good as Ginsburg NewJeffCT Jun 2016 #30
I posed the same question recently PJMcK Jun 2016 #32
Why before you know it edhopper Jun 2016 #4
Hey, asshole, STATES RIGHTS! Cosmocat Jun 2016 #5
Lol...'States' Rights' is the conservative shorthand for 'It works in my favor.'' Volaris Jun 2016 #13
No, no, we say "religious liberty" now gratuitous Jun 2016 #27
President Clinton is going to have some bad news for you very soon. GOLGO 13 Jun 2016 #6
Simple concept... orwell Jun 2016 #7
+1 as a judge he should not be using that treestar Jun 2016 #11
meaning "religious liberty" to stuff your nonsense down everyone else's throat, you lying pos. niyad Jun 2016 #8
Yeah Johonny Jun 2016 #10
Exactly. spooky3 Jun 2016 #15
Boo hoo. ananda Jun 2016 #9
Yeah yeah yeah. Cry me a fucking river assholes. Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #12
I hear Saudi Arabia is great at protecting religious rights. spooky3 Jun 2016 #14
I see that Justice Alito isn't satisifed with his own vote The Second Stone Jun 2016 #16
It is not religious liberty bucolic_frolic Jun 2016 #17
Ha! Glad he's unhappy. lark Jun 2016 #18
He should just retire Bettie Jun 2016 #19
Fuck alito, thomas and roberts gopiscrap Jun 2016 #20
Call them a whambulance. Nitram Jun 2016 #21
For those precious judges: Liberalagogo Jun 2016 #22
Fuck'em. Solly Mack Jun 2016 #23
Poor Alito! He can't force his religion on other people! muntrv Jun 2016 #24
Four more Alitos! Four more Alitos!! HughBeaumont Jun 2016 #28
Conservative's tears are the sweetest tears. bluedigger Jun 2016 #29
Justice Alito... NewJeffCT Jun 2016 #31
To extremist evangelicals religious freedom for them means Christian Sharia Law for everyone else Monk06 Jun 2016 #33
Well, my nose bleeds for them meow2u3 Jun 2016 #34
True religious freedom isn't his beef. lark Jul 2016 #35
Call the WHAMMMMbulance! Odin2005 Jul 2016 #36
The real unjustified entitlement in the USA annominous Jul 2016 #37
When SCOTUS member mentions benld74 Jul 2016 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Conservative Justices Bem...