General Discussion

Xolodno

(7,349 posts)

86. Read the article a little more closely...

Wed Jun 29, 2016, 12:05 PM

Jun 2016

It does a lot of referencing to older issues that have been resolved. And there is a healthy dose of opinion by the author.

Nor does it go into detail about "operating subsidies".

If this is so bad, why not also do a comparison of the cost of adding two lanes on the 99 and I5 from LA to SF? Oh and how often highway expansion often has cost overruns? Or take longer than planned? Nor mention the operating subsidies our highway system already gets?

Hey if its that bad, show the cost alternatives to more concrete.

And why didn't they mention that, sure, the project is overdue (largely to lawsuits to stop it), but the project is actually AHEAD of schedule given when you account the ground breaking starting later than planned.

And one last thing, again, if its such a boondogle, why isn't XpressWest also being derided as such?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

121 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California Hits the Brakes on High-Speed Rail Fiasco [View all] Purveyor Jun 2016 OP

As a Californian, I think that it's time to pull the plug on this boondogle n/t taught_me_patience Jun 2016 #1

We do need to have transportation other than air between the major cities. haele Jun 2016 #2

What about a tunnel? AngryAmish Jun 2016 #13

Earthquakes. nt tblue37 Jun 2016 #41

No we don't Sen. Walter Sobchak Jun 2016 #14

No, we need better transit on routes people use most frequently. LeftyMom Jun 2016 #35

I'd be so happy to have a train XemaSab Jun 2016 #70

We don't even have a transit link from downtown Sac to the airport! LeftyMom Jun 2016 #110

The people who organized the initiative shouldn't have lied to the voters ripcord Jun 2016 #65

I know. Other countries get to have high speed travel throughout, but we're too pathetic to have it. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #44

We have high-speed travel anoNY42 Jun 2016 #51

Air travel is time consuming, expensive and impractical adigal Jun 2016 #56

But it is less time-consuming anoNY42 Jun 2016 #62

Like I say, we're idiots who don't deserve the kind of pleasures other developed countries have. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #68

It depends on the distances involved. Let's look at a trip from LA to NYC. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #73

A day and a half??? LA to San Francisco is 381 miles. adigal Jun 2016 #106

I believe you misread my post. I was speaking of a trip from LA to New York City. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #111

Yeah, but if you can't drive 55... 6chars Jun 2016 #119

Yeah, it does depend on the distances involved. HughBeaumont Jun 2016 #112

You could always take the train from Cleveland to DC. It only takes 11 hours. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #116

Because other countries have government oversight and accountability. Initech Jun 2016 #80

I voted against it. Upgrade/expand local public transit instead. Auggie Jun 2016 #53

Yeah I agree, kill it. Initech Jun 2016 #77

Just as with the interstate highway system, the Feds will have to do this for the public good brush Jun 2016 #81

Kill it, already. Throd Jun 2016 #3

As a Californian, I think we should build it faster Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #4

You sure about that? Throd Jun 2016 #6

High speed rail in other countries is all I said about it. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #8

It's a simple math equation that doesn't pencil out. Throd Jun 2016 #11

What is odd about ending a low efficiency high energy, pollution heavy, space using Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #17

Private automobiles cause global warming... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #63

It isn't high speed rail ripcord Jun 2016 #12

Why does high speed rail work every where but the US? liberal N proud Jun 2016 #5

My guess is magic gratuitous Jun 2016 #7

"111 similar systems around the world and found only three that cover their operating cost." cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #9

How does the interstate equation work out? seabeckind Jun 2016 #60

It doesn't. It works in very dense places like Western Europe, Japan, and coastal China Recursion Jun 2016 #10

Because oil addicted interest in the US are trying to kill it. Firebrand Gary Jun 2016 #38

And that is the answer! liberal N proud Jun 2016 #45

I would love to have High Speed Rail... RME_SFC Jun 2016 #102

We need something that challenges domestic air travel. liberal N proud Jun 2016 #109

Depending on Cost/time ratio RME_SFC Jun 2016 #113

If you use Eur pope as an example, Time/Cost is equivalent to Air liberal N proud Jun 2016 #118

Is this the one that Florida.... Fla_Democrat Jun 2016 #15

Yes. Igel Jun 2016 #23

It actually makes a lot more sense for Florida. LeftyMom Jun 2016 #36

Florida is flat, that is true anoNY42 Jun 2016 #52

I would think between Orlando and Miami with some selective stops sure would. seabeckind Jun 2016 #61

I just don't see anoNY42 Jun 2016 #64

Talking from a functional requirement standpoint. seabeckind Jun 2016 #66

Miami-Orlando proposed 25+ yrs ago, but dropped. Would have dog-legged to Tampa. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #79

Orlando to Tampa HSR was one of the stupidest ideas ever. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #74

If California wanted to build bullet trains between LA and SF and their respective suburbs Sen. Walter Sobchak Jun 2016 #16

What if they just built a tunnel between LA and San Francisco? AngryAmish Jun 2016 #21

The world's longest train tunnel is the Gotthard tunnel in Switzerland. It's 35 miles long. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #22

Geological issues. Such as that teeny tiny San Andres fault thing, and the many oil fields underahedgerow Jun 2016 #39

They have tunnels in Iran and they have both earthquakes and oil fields. AngryAmish Jun 2016 #43

Well, it's not really a 'could just' proposition. Mapping, land acquisition, geological flaws, underahedgerow Jun 2016 #54

Maglev goes 400mph Major Nikon Jun 2016 #24

I take it you haven't seen the route Sen. Walter Sobchak Jun 2016 #25

What it ultimately will or might have done isn't the same as what it could do Major Nikon Jun 2016 #31

How about the Hyperloop? It's looking very, very cool. underahedgerow Jun 2016 #40

Intelligent countries all over the world have high speed rail... TheProgressive Jun 2016 #18

And so do we, in the corridor where it makes sense to have it Recursion Jun 2016 #27

Chicago To St. Louis To New Orleans Too ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #57

That's an interesting idea, but I think it's too sparse to be self-sustaining Recursion Jun 2016 #58

Business Travel Between Houston and Chicago is Quite High ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #82

The rail that runs from Boston to DC isn't exactly "high speed" NewJeffCT Jun 2016 #121

We need to think about optimizing our freeways for driverless cars MindPilot Jun 2016 #19

We can call them "Trains"! seabeckind Jun 2016 #59

As usual, we dither while Rome burns. We should have built it years ago. People who are fighting vanlassie Jun 2016 #20

maybe we can't do big things anymore. Good thing the Hoover Dam is already built. TeamPooka Jun 2016 #26

Could you imagine having to write the environmental impact assessment on the Hoover Dam? Recursion Jun 2016 #29

The money could be better spent bhikkhu Jun 2016 #28

We are spending over $1 Trillion on the F-35 Lightning II fighter/bomber KeepItReal Jun 2016 #32

Up to Gov Brown and the legislature. 1939 Jun 2016 #49

We desperately need a high speed train between LA and SF. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #30

It is horrid and long drive but this project isnt working out. Too many moving parts Liberal_in_LA Jun 2016 #33

Seems to be working out to me. It survived it's biggest challenge in the courtroom. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #34

The train's still going to take hours and go through smelly valley towns. LeftyMom Jun 2016 #37

The towns aren't smelly, it's the CAFOs stacked up along the 5 FWY. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #42

I just checked the airfare on Southwest from LA to SF. $69 each way. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #46

Well that totally destroyed his entire argument seabeckind Jun 2016 #50

Just providing correct information. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #71

Ahh, you get a coupon. seabeckind Jun 2016 #84

On the whole, it certainly does make up for the bad stuff, yes. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #88

How about more than 4? seabeckind Jun 2016 #97

Here's the list: Just reading posts Jun 2016 #99

You're a real fan of absurd arguments, aren't you? seabeckind Jun 2016 #108

You brought up venues that weren't being served by a multitude of airports. Fargo certainly Just reading posts Jun 2016 #115

Right now on Southwest.com: 1-way LAX to SFO depart 6/30/16 = $161 SunSeeker Jun 2016 #90

Last-minute airfares always cost more. Purchase at least a few weeks in advance and the price drops Just reading posts Jun 2016 #91

That would not work for business travelers or anyone who wants flexibility.. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #94

It's always worked for me, but I almost always fly for pleasure, not business. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #96

The towns smell because the CAFOs and factories and such are the town's employers. LeftyMom Jun 2016 #114

Everyone know highways are free seabeckind Jun 2016 #47

Brockway, North Haverbrook and Ogdenville all have one Orrex Jun 2016 #48

... Javaman Jun 2016 #69

This very thread is why I love DU trumad Jun 2016 #55

There are a lot of jobs being created in the Fresno area, SalviaBlue Jun 2016 #67

The only thing I hate more than driving is flying. hunter Jun 2016 #72

What's your alternative? Just a for instance: I enjoy spending a week or two in Thailand each year. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #75

You and I live in entirely different worlds. hunter Jun 2016 #83

I can't picture North by Northwest on an airplane. seabeckind Jun 2016 #85

Not even a cropduster? mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2016 #117

The Empire Builder seabeckind Jun 2016 #120

Let's look at my trip to Thailand in your world: Just reading posts Jun 2016 #87

And you describe everything that is wrong with this world. hunter Jun 2016 #100

In this world I've mangaged to visit almost two dozen different countries in the last 30 years. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #105

Moving the goalposts a tad there. seabeckind Jun 2016 #95

The post I was replying to argued for the elimination of fossil fuels, which would certainly impact Just reading posts Jun 2016 #98

The sailing ships was your absurd argument. seabeckind Jun 2016 #103

He said no fossil fuels, not me. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #107

We can spend trillions... deathrind Jun 2016 #76

That, and it inspired Season 2 of True Detective nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #78

Read the article a little more closely... Xolodno Jun 2016 #86

I am sure I will never get to ride one of these in my life time... yuiyoshida Jun 2016 #89

I rode a high speed train when I took the Channel Tunnel from Dover to Paris some years ago. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #92

how'd I know it'd be Vartabedian? he's said CAHSR is dead every other month MisterP Jun 2016 #93

We have low-speed rail in SoCal in the form of Amtrack and Metrolink. stopbush Jun 2016 #101

Similar things have been said for every rail system built upaloopa Jun 2016 #104