Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
6. Harry Reid has been studyin' on this!
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 12:32 PM
Jun 2016
In the event of a Senate or House vacancy, Massachusetts currently requires a special election to be held within 145 to 160 days. In the interim, the governor has the authority to appoint a successor. But Reid’s team has identified a portion of the law that allows an officeholder to start the special election clock by filing a resignation letter, but also announcing an intention to vacate the seat at a later date.

In theory, Warren could file such a letter 145 days before the Jan. 20, 2017 inauguration and successfully block Baker from picking any temporary replacement. But that would expose Warren to a potentially awkward position. If Clinton lost the November election and Warren wanted to keep her Senate seat, she would have to make the politically difficult decision of rescinding her planned resignation — or run for an open seat that she created.

A more likely scenario would be that Warren would start the clock ticking for a special Massachusetts ballot only if Clinton won, with an intent-to-resign letter dated the day after the Nov. 8 national election.

That would give Baker’s temporary appointee less than three months to serve between Inauguration Day and the special election. While that might prevent a Democratic majority from taking over in January, the damage, from a Democatic perspective, might be limited to a short period of time until Massachusetts’s Democrat-leaning electorate went to the polls to elect a senator in a special election.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/06/03/harry-reid-studies-legal-scenarios-for-filling-senate-seat-elizabeth-warren-gets-vice-presidential-nod/3FSrNJlAhqRoiWt6iQMK7J/story.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

no....we need the Senate seat.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #1
No, I disagree. First of all, make certain we crush Trump like a walnut. WheelWalker Jun 2016 #4
I agree Cosmocat Jun 2016 #22
Come on. We only lose her seat for a few months. Massachusetts doesn't allow Scott Brown Lyric Jun 2016 #5
Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA). NT Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #7
lol. Whoever. The point remains the same. Lyric Jun 2016 #8
But what we lose more importantly Saviolo Jun 2016 #13
The right ticket for the right time - for a weakened Republican Party, maybe, but not for the BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #2
According to Massachusetts law Little Star Jun 2016 #3
When John Kerry was running in 2004 NewJeffCT Jun 2016 #10
Harry Reid has been studyin' on this! yallerdawg Jun 2016 #6
And the last time that happened, Scott Brown took Ted Kennedy's seat. longship Jun 2016 #20
Scott Brown won against a terrible candidate. yallerdawg Jun 2016 #25
Sorry, I cannot and will not support Warren for VEEP. longship Jun 2016 #29
Agreed. Now that MA has a Republican governor, I'm not willing to trust MA to produce and elect a BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #33
I am concerned Scalded Nun Jun 2016 #9
Warren needs to be given some independence as VP andym Jun 2016 #15
Nope! Warren needs to stay in the US Senate. longship Jun 2016 #21
Hillary will never pick her...she's too liberal nt adigal Jun 2016 #11
That's a b.s. statement. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #34
i think they are a perfect 1-2 punch. mopinko Jun 2016 #12
If I was Warren, I wouldn't take the offer. AllTooEasy Jun 2016 #14
Ted Kennedy turned down McGovern twice as VP in 1972 andym Jun 2016 #16
The possibility of a Clinton/Warren ticket is all that is holding me here Android3.14 Jun 2016 #17
It sounds like you want a second bite at the apple. eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #32
I'm unsure what that means. Android3.14 Jun 2016 #35
I think Warren is the best choice! mountain grammy Jun 2016 #18
Warren is the only smart choice now. The men in contention are pretty milquetoast. nt Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #19
YEP Cosmocat Jun 2016 #23
I have evolved on the possibility of Warren as VP. gordianot Jun 2016 #24
Wall Street hates Elizabeth Warren! yallerdawg Jun 2016 #26
Wall Street hate of Warren borders on Sanders level hate. gordianot Jun 2016 #28
Yeah, to get Trump elected Warpy Jun 2016 #27
+1 leftstreet Jun 2016 #30
I have to agree, but will be surprised if this happens quaker bill Jun 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Digby: "Clinton and ...»Reply #6