Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neoliberalism, My Ass [View all]That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)23. When the Saudi's "opened up the spiggot" they shut down a lot of the fracking in TX.
There are start-up and shut-down costs involved in fracking. When Saudi Arabia saw us cutting into there profits, they increased production until the US frack field operating costs exceeded the potential profits.
It would be more sensible to at least have a plan for all of this before we just pull the plug and to make fracking safer until we can transition to renewables.
I think it would be more sensible to figure out how fracking could be done without causing earthquakes or contaminating the drinking water of the communities around the frack fields. You can live with higher oil prices(like we did during *'s pResidency), you can't live without water.
And who says the US will get the oil from fracking anyways?
The U.S. is poised to lift a 40-year ban on exporting oil.
Lawmakers are close to authorizing oil exports as part of a broader $1.1 trillion spending and tax bill working its way through Congress. Sources told CNN the compromise measure, which is needed to avert a government shutdown, includes a provision that would roll back the export restriction. <snip>
... U.S. refiners want to keep it in place because they've benefited from being able to buy oil at the cheaper domestic price and then sell it at the higher global price.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration has analyzed the outcome and expects that refiners would cut jobs and suffer a loss of $22 billion in annual profits by 2025 if the ban is lifted. <snip>
...Environmental groups also want to keep the ban in place.
"Our climate and communities cannot afford the hazardous oil production that would come with lifting the crude oil export ban," a conservation group that includes the Sierra Club wrote in a recent letter to Congress.
Lawmakers are close to authorizing oil exports as part of a broader $1.1 trillion spending and tax bill working its way through Congress. Sources told CNN the compromise measure, which is needed to avert a government shutdown, includes a provision that would roll back the export restriction. <snip>
... U.S. refiners want to keep it in place because they've benefited from being able to buy oil at the cheaper domestic price and then sell it at the higher global price.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration has analyzed the outcome and expects that refiners would cut jobs and suffer a loss of $22 billion in annual profits by 2025 if the ban is lifted. <snip>
...Environmental groups also want to keep the ban in place.
"Our climate and communities cannot afford the hazardous oil production that would come with lifting the crude oil export ban," a conservation group that includes the Sierra Club wrote in a recent letter to Congress.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Could you be any more generalized? Sounds like one comment made you mad and produced this rant
bjobotts
Jun 2016
#98
Republican governance has devastated the middle class, not trade deals.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2016
#11
Trade deals have eliminated jobs, while austerity (both parties) has cut away safety nets
leveymg
Jun 2016
#55
I wonder if we go after trade deals because the republican base agrees with us but
pampango
Jun 2016
#57
America used to be the #1 exporter of finished goods and now we are the #1 importer of fin. goods
bjobotts
Jun 2016
#102
Neoliberalism is Reganism, trickle down economics and voodo economics where corps do
bjobotts
Jun 2016
#103
When the Saudi's "opened up the spiggot" they shut down a lot of the fracking in TX.
That Guy 888
Jun 2016
#23
Nothing like single-issue zealots to ignore a list of 358 accomplishments. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2016
#9
Wow, tin ear AND insults. I am guessing the expiration date for elitist policy is nearing. eom
Betty Karlson
Jun 2016
#15
income and wealth inequality are unimportant when you're on the fat side of the equation
tk2kewl
Jun 2016
#39
Bernie, Corbyn and British unions all wanted the UK to stay in the EU. Yeah, they're elitists not
pampango
Jun 2016
#45
"the expiration date for elitist policy is nearing". Not for conservative elitist policy it's not.
pampango
Jun 2016
#89
Bernie was not directly involved, of course, but he made his opinion known. n/t
pampango
Jul 2016
#140
yep. Bill and now Obama were free to veto GOP bills and let them try to over-ride
yurbud
Jun 2016
#52
If Brexit really were a response to neoliberalism, then conservatives are sure smarter than liberals
pampango
Jun 2016
#46
I'm still trying to imagine the Island Vacation, a lack of home insurance and 20K cash to
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#61
it's Milt Shook, a true hack who never meet a 3rd-way economic inflection point or so called left
AntiBank
Jun 2016
#64
Keep in mind these are people who measure success by their own profits.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2016
#80
I am a union person, worked hard for my union, did a lot of organizing and did a lot of representing
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#81
The OP actually presented a list of ~371~of President Obama's accomplishments
ismnotwasm
Jun 2016
#83