Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neoliberalism, My Ass [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)92. "Free trade" versus "protectionism"?
Unless you mean the following by "protectionism" that is right wing framing.
The main points of neo-liberalism include:
THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle. No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital, goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and "trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very much.
CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for business.
DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could diminsh profits, including protecting the environmentand safety on the job.
PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed, privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs.
ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as "lazy."
THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle. No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital, goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and "trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very much.
CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for business.
DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could diminsh profits, including protecting the environmentand safety on the job.
PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed, privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs.
ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as "lazy."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Could you be any more generalized? Sounds like one comment made you mad and produced this rant
bjobotts
Jun 2016
#98
Republican governance has devastated the middle class, not trade deals.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2016
#11
Trade deals have eliminated jobs, while austerity (both parties) has cut away safety nets
leveymg
Jun 2016
#55
I wonder if we go after trade deals because the republican base agrees with us but
pampango
Jun 2016
#57
America used to be the #1 exporter of finished goods and now we are the #1 importer of fin. goods
bjobotts
Jun 2016
#102
Neoliberalism is Reganism, trickle down economics and voodo economics where corps do
bjobotts
Jun 2016
#103
When the Saudi's "opened up the spiggot" they shut down a lot of the fracking in TX.
That Guy 888
Jun 2016
#23
Nothing like single-issue zealots to ignore a list of 358 accomplishments. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2016
#9
Wow, tin ear AND insults. I am guessing the expiration date for elitist policy is nearing. eom
Betty Karlson
Jun 2016
#15
income and wealth inequality are unimportant when you're on the fat side of the equation
tk2kewl
Jun 2016
#39
Bernie, Corbyn and British unions all wanted the UK to stay in the EU. Yeah, they're elitists not
pampango
Jun 2016
#45
"the expiration date for elitist policy is nearing". Not for conservative elitist policy it's not.
pampango
Jun 2016
#89
Bernie was not directly involved, of course, but he made his opinion known. n/t
pampango
Jul 2016
#140
yep. Bill and now Obama were free to veto GOP bills and let them try to over-ride
yurbud
Jun 2016
#52
If Brexit really were a response to neoliberalism, then conservatives are sure smarter than liberals
pampango
Jun 2016
#46
I'm still trying to imagine the Island Vacation, a lack of home insurance and 20K cash to
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#61
it's Milt Shook, a true hack who never meet a 3rd-way economic inflection point or so called left
AntiBank
Jun 2016
#64
Keep in mind these are people who measure success by their own profits.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2016
#80
I am a union person, worked hard for my union, did a lot of organizing and did a lot of representing
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#81
The OP actually presented a list of ~371~of President Obama's accomplishments
ismnotwasm
Jun 2016
#83