Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: With Driverless Cars, a Safety Dilemma Arises: Would you buy a car that might decide to kill you? [View all]tblue37
(68,437 posts)66. Yep. Statistically flying is *much* safer than traveling by car, yet people fear flying much more--
mainly because they are powerless to affect the situation.
Oh, and they are way high up there. As one comic put it, "After a plane crash, the pilots aren't getting out of the plane to exchange insurance information.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
With Driverless Cars, a Safety Dilemma Arises: Would you buy a car that might decide to kill you? [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
OP
No - it works with input X=output Y not with every possible scenario linked to a specific response
whatthehey
Jun 2016
#12
Values aren't necessary, just priority commands. Value driven AI is a fair way off yet.
Kentonio
Jun 2016
#33
I agree it is very contrived and provides cause to wonder abouit the result will be used.
Todays_Illusion
Jun 2016
#59
Keen way for a group to plot to kill someone -- simply step in front of their car and . . .
Journeyman
Jun 2016
#3
Well, I certainly can't see any reason why we should be slightly suspicious of...
Shandris
Jun 2016
#10
Yep. Statistically flying is *much* safer than traveling by car, yet people fear flying much more--
tblue37
Jul 2016
#66
This reminds me of one 5-year period when I kept getting called for jury duty. Over and over again,
tblue37
Jul 2016
#70
Without aids I am profoundly deaf. With them, I still can't understand most speech unless
tblue37
Jul 2016
#77
We need individual transport pods--like in "Minority Report," or "The Jetsons":
tblue37
Jul 2016
#69
I'm guessing the 1% will be able to pay for the "personal protection priority" option. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#26
As a career machinist, I'd bet you've had close calls with human error.
JustABozoOnThisBus
Jun 2016
#40
Considering how often your cell phone drops calls or your tablet freezes up or gets
tblue37
Jul 2016
#71
Driverless Cars Should Kill Passengers To Save Lives - But Then People Won't Buy Them
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#44
If an airline pilot ever had to choose whether to kill everyone on the plane in order to save a much
TacoD
Jun 2016
#50
With my last job I was driving all time on Florida streets. I'm all for driverless cars.
RAFisher
Jun 2016
#56
Right now we are all at the mercey of other drivers and have managed to reduce hiway deaths/per
Todays_Illusion
Jun 2016
#58
I would trust the driverless car over a normal car, unless the driver is a woman.
Little Tich
Jun 2016
#60
So you are saying pedestrians would be walking where they obviously aren't supposed to be
alphafemale
Jul 2016
#61