Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
15. By having the federal reserve buy their fecal mortgage backed securities at face value!
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 06:13 PM
Jun 2012

It's called "Cash for Trash", and QE and QE2, and it's why the bankers and Wall st. are rolling in dough right now. (no not that QE that just celebrated a Jubilee without any debt forgiveness. Quantitative Easing - a fancy pants term for the Fed taking on shit assets from banks onto its own balance sheets)

Meanwhile, Ma and Pa Kettle get no relief on their upside down mortgages.

Meanwhile, the official Fed policy for righting the capsized economy is to flood the same banks who deliberately inflated the housing bubble with zero interest rate liquidity so they can play HFT(high frequency trading) computer games in the stock market and replace the funny money of housing with funny money from stocks. Let's just replace one deliberately inflated asset bubble with another - that make sense right? Oh, but they'll be even handed and fair about it, surely? Well, do Ma & Pa Kettle get comped the zero interest Bernanke Bux that the banks get? No. Do they get to front run the stock market with HFT computerized trading (which ought to already be illegal under existing SEC regulations)? No. Do the downtrodden Kettles receive a Fed issued debit card charged up with $50,000 and a blessing from Ben to "Go, Thou, and spend it in the real economy and get our industry moving again!" No.

Now you wanted to know how the 1% could profit from falling real estate prices. As indicated above, they are protected from losses on their class specific vehicles for speculating on real estate. Poor people don't have Mortgage Backed Securities - neither sound ones nor crap stuffed ones. Banks, the premier 1% players participate in that. When their crap-stuffed MBOs start to stink, Smiling Ben takes them off their hands at face value instead of their market value (which is nil). They are protected as a matter of policy: Too Big To Fail. Real estate crashes, and the private sector assets, or trash-sets as they might be more properly called, are then moved onto the publicly backed balance sheet of Uncle Ben at or close to par (that's backed by the currency and future earnings of American taxpayers). During all this, ordinary people are losing purchasing power like shit going through a goose. They're unemployed and looking for work. They're getting permanently dropped from the rolls of the workforce. They're taking cutbacks in wages and hours. Their incomes are being way out-paced by inflation. As the report indicates they've lost the equivalent of about 20-25 years gains in accumulated net worth. But this is not happening to the rich, neither the rich individuals or the TBTF institutions they suck teat on. What does that disparity mean?

It means the 1% can buy up all the assets that are hitting the market because poorer people are repossessed on or otherwise forced to liquidate. The purchasing power of the rich is not just intact since early 2009, but has objectively improved. It's not just improved but because the purchasing power of the non-rich is actually in reverse, purchasing power is being multiplied for the rich. The Fed backstopped 1% thus are able snap up swathes of real estate and other assets at CYCLICAL LOWS. And that's what they're doing right now. If you want to buy a piece of property from them, and they want you to eventually - but for the moment they are in accumulation mode - you will have to pay a higher price.

The criminal class gets trillions thrown at it, as a reward for a career of crime and fucking things up, all in the wan hope that they will start lending again I suppose, someday. They also escape prosecution for control fraud. The real economy and the 99% who swim in it get fucked through the eyesockets - by the banksters and their boot boys in the government.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

and the top 1% sucked it all up. n/t Horse with no Name Jun 2012 #1
Agreed bobobjohnae Jun 2012 #2
How, exactly? Most of this is due to the house price bubble deflating. Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #5
The one percent received a nice bail out on their failed investments. HuckleB Jun 2012 #6
By having the federal reserve buy their fecal mortgage backed securities at face value! kenny blankenship Jun 2012 #15
Kenny, this is one of the most righteous coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #17
agreed. laundry_queen Jun 2012 #22
So how did Lehman Brothers go bankrupt? Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #20
Because it happened too fast laundry_queen Jun 2012 #23
Lehman bankruptcy happend before the cash-for-trash programs began. The coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #24
here's one theory: HiPointDem Jun 2012 #32
Indeed a GREAT explanation........ socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #26
Thanks for so eloquently proving my 1 line reply Horse with no Name Jun 2012 #27
+1. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #29
kenny blankenship speaks the truth. Prometheus Bound Jun 2012 #37
It was fake wealth to begin with NickB79 Jun 2012 #3
just compare 2001 ($106K) to $77K in 2011 - Huge drop with NO housing factor nt msongs Jun 2012 #4
zing! cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #8
Very true. I'm not arguing that there wasn't a big drop NickB79 Jun 2012 #9
Only if you think housing wasn't already in a bubble in 2001. boppers Jun 2012 #35
A bank lending against that fake value would have disagreed cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #7
All very good points. NickB79 Jun 2012 #10
Wages are not wealth, or worth. boppers Jun 2012 #31
The only the thing fake about it is that it was built on Ponzi bank credit. girl gone mad Jun 2012 #11
I have a different take on it NickB79 Jun 2012 #12
Any time you hear about "overpopulation" remember one thing Zalatix Jun 2012 #13
Who's talking about controlling overpopulation? NickB79 Jun 2012 #14
In 2009, world total fertility rate was 2.47 births per woman. It's likely lower today (recession/ HiPointDem Jun 2012 #34
Speculation drove these bubbles in commodities. girl gone mad Jun 2012 #16
"Economic growth does not have to come at the expense of the environment" The2ndWheel Jun 2012 #18
Speculation can only do so much NickB79 Jun 2012 #25
"You can't speculate and drive the price of a commodity through the roof that's widely available" girl gone mad Jun 2012 #28
I suggest investing in Tulips. boppers Jun 2012 #33
Sure looks like the predicted 'bumpy plauteau' to me n/t Strelnikov_ Jun 2012 #21
no, what you saw was the result of too much money chasing too few real investment opportunities = HiPointDem Jun 2012 #30
"Mission accomplished!" bighughdiehl Jun 2012 #19
Since 2001, every decile of the income distribution lost wealth except the top 10%. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Brutal Recession Destroye...»Reply #15