Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Simple Gun Control Law [View all]

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
67. "Designed to create mass casualties."
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 03:20 PM
Jul 2016

Playing your obtuse obstructionist word games is now just plain irritating.

How you all repeatedly get away with rightwing NRA talking points is beyond me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Simple Gun Control Law [View all] louis c Jul 2016 OP
No one has the Constitutional right to own or buy a car. former9thward Jul 2016 #1
What do you think the "Well Regulated" part of the second amendment means? louis c Jul 2016 #8
It means in good working order TeddyR Jul 2016 #13
Exactly right. Just reading posts Jul 2016 #14
It means the militia is in good working order, not the guns. baldguy Jul 2016 #48
If you had actually researched it you would not have written guillaumeb Jul 2016 #99
Enlighten me TeddyR Jul 2016 #102
Only you can come to enlightenment. eom guillaumeb Jul 2016 #113
In order for a "militia" deathrind Jul 2016 #101
It means that your weapon is the same type and caliber of those issued to the active military. oneshooter Jul 2016 #17
so, the average citizen should be able to own a tank, louis c Jul 2016 #18
Those are considered to be crew served weapons. oneshooter Jul 2016 #20
The guns on tanks have to be made unusable before a civilian can buy one jmowreader Jul 2016 #23
Incorrect sarisataka Jul 2016 #24
I rebuild, repair and restore WW2 era armored vehicles. oneshooter Jul 2016 #27
How about a newly-manufactured minigun? Orrex Jul 2016 #49
In fact I have one of these in my shop. oneshooter Jul 2016 #21
Nuclear weapons are controlled sarisataka Jul 2016 #22
Discriminate vs indiscriminate weapons Reiyuki Jul 2016 #29
How do you propose banning explosives? FBaggins Jul 2016 #58
Well, you basically can't, Reiyuki Jul 2016 #69
it was the original intent Amishman Jul 2016 #40
But 22 caliber is much too high power for a citzen to won... scscholar Jul 2016 #31
????? oneshooter Jul 2016 #34
Nothing. It's an explanation, not a qualification. Donald Ian Rankin Jul 2016 #56
Actually, the 4th ammendment probably covers it quaker bill Jul 2016 #103
Some think edhopper Jul 2016 #2
By law anyone 18-45 is part of the militia Press Virginia Jul 2016 #4
That is heavily debated edhopper Jul 2016 #5
It's the law. It's been on the books for 60 years Press Virginia Jul 2016 #35
so you have no problem restricting edhopper Jul 2016 #36
No. I'm just citing the law as it pertains Press Virginia Jul 2016 #41
And there is a debate edhopper Jul 2016 #43
The only debate is among those who ignore what the founders said regarding the militia Press Virginia Jul 2016 #44
Again edhopper Jul 2016 #46
The same thing they said about telephones and computers Press Virginia Jul 2016 #50
So you think the founders believed in edhopper Jul 2016 #51
The militia was the "whole of the people" Press Virginia Jul 2016 #52
And yet edhopper Jul 2016 #54
Uhhh no Press Virginia Jul 2016 #64
Males ages 18-45 edhopper Jul 2016 #73
False. Press Virginia Jul 2016 #75
You need edhopper Jul 2016 #76
See Heller Press Virginia Jul 2016 #98
Not according to edhopper Jul 2016 #100
He only needs a license and registration to drive on publics roads Press Virginia Jul 2016 #3
Don't need to register a car to own or keep on private property hack89 Jul 2016 #6
I made that distimction in my analogy louis c Jul 2016 #9
You can buy unregistered cars hack89 Jul 2016 #10
Most states excise cars, though, so it would need a title (nt) Recursion Jul 2016 #26
Hence the bill of sale. nt hack89 Jul 2016 #30
Soooo.... linuxman Jul 2016 #7
Exactly. Straw Man Jul 2016 #11
To continue the analogy sarisataka Jul 2016 #12
And any damage done while using the weapon in violation of the law will be called an "accident" (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jul 2016 #45
Works for me. Just reading posts Jul 2016 #15
I can cross statelines and legally purchase any firearm I want... Heeeeers Johnny Jul 2016 #53
Several years ago my car was seized by the police because the registration was expired ansible Jul 2016 #16
Keep it off the roads. Igel Jul 2016 #19
It doesn't need to be registered to be sold. It needs to be titled Recursion Jul 2016 #25
Eleven Things Congress Could Do On Guns yallerdawg Jul 2016 #28
There are no weapons of war on American streets TeddyR Jul 2016 #55
Ironically... Lizzie Poppet Jul 2016 #60
I stand corrected TeddyR Jul 2016 #63
No weapons of war on our streets? yallerdawg Jul 2016 #65
What "weapon of war" has been used in the US in a terrorist attack or mass shooting? TeddyR Jul 2016 #66
"Designed to create mass casualties." yallerdawg Jul 2016 #67
What right wing NRA talking point did I use TeddyR Jul 2016 #97
They won't Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #105
Limitless NRA talking points! (Happy Fourth of July!) yallerdawg Jul 2016 #108
In my experience when someone says they want guns "off the street" they mean "not in civilian hands" Just reading posts Jul 2016 #62
2016 Democratic Party Platform Draft yallerdawg Jul 2016 #68
Where it says "keep weapons of war—such as assault weapons—off our streets" do you think it's Just reading posts Jul 2016 #70
You had it right. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #71
Saying "off the streets" is weasel-wording. If you want to ban or confiscate them, just say so. Just reading posts Jul 2016 #72
That poster will not bother to read that Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #81
One does what one can. Just reading posts Jul 2016 #82
I know Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #83
Good thing my AR is not a weapon of war Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #79
They use the phrase "weapon of war" as if that, in and of itself, means something should be Just reading posts Jul 2016 #84
And they refuse to accept simple facts Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #85
I've noticed that. Correcting an obvious mistake or even asking for a clarification is dismissed Just reading posts Jul 2016 #87
with 1 million in insurance Skittles Jul 2016 #32
$2 million liability sarisataka Jul 2016 #33
Would you be opposed Abq_Sarah Jul 2016 #37
All cars are unregistered when you buy them... ileus Jul 2016 #38
Awesome idea -- then I can have as many unregistered machine guns as I want on my property aikoaiko Jul 2016 #39
I understand a person can own a fully automatic weopon or tank ect. if you get a special permit. Why doc03 Jul 2016 #42
At least 50% of firearms (probably more) have detachable magazines. The wisdom (or not) of banning Just reading posts Jul 2016 #59
Not talking about confiscation, future sales and maybe buy-backs like I heard they doc03 Jul 2016 #74
"buy-backs" that aren't optional are confiscation discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #77
Did I say buy-backs were mandatory? n/t doc03 Jul 2016 #88
You said like Australia n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #89
The report I heard on Australia never said it was mandatory. n/t doc03 Jul 2016 #92
It's cool, no problem discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #96
The Australian "buy back" was confiscation. Gun owners were told to turn over their guns Just reading posts Jul 2016 #80
What sales without background checks? Require them on all sales, doc03 Jul 2016 #90
The millions of them that will be done by the simple expedience of ignoring the law. Just reading posts Jul 2016 #94
Australia was defacto confiscation Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #86
I didn't realize that. I have heard they worked well in Australia but the report didn't doc03 Jul 2016 #91
I can assure you, the Australian government was mandatory. Just reading posts Jul 2016 #95
And crickets for a response Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #104
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Just reading posts Jul 2016 #107
Well what is your solution to stop a nut from buying a doc03 Jul 2016 #109
Well, let's see Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #110
Well WTF did you start arguing about whether the Australian law was doc03 Jul 2016 #111
See post 95, it was a compulsory buyback Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #112
Well if you have all the answers what would you do to help doc03 Jul 2016 #93
Why not demand a permit for demanding permits? discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #78
A sane country edhopper Jul 2016 #47
If you don't like guns, don't buy one (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jul 2016 #57
Choice is a good thing (nt) Just reading posts Jul 2016 #61
People who don't like gunz, don't like a toting yahoo standing next to them and Hoyt Jul 2016 #106
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Simple Gun Control Law»Reply #67