Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: by Robert Reich:The Trans Pacific Partnership is a travesty. [View all]AntiBank
(1,339 posts)30. Chamber of Commerce Lobbyist Tom Donohue: Clinton Will Support TPP After Election
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/chamber-of-commerce-lobby_b_9104096.html
In an interview from Davos with Bloomberg TV on January 20, Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue, a top lobbyist for the pro-corporate-power Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP] agreement, assured viewers that if Hillary Clinton wins the Presidential election, Clinton will support the TPP, even though she opposes it now.
Reporting on the interview, Inside U.S. Trade noted:
The Chamber president said he expected Hillary Clinton would ultimately support the TPP if she becomes the Democratic nominee for president and is elected. He argued that she has publicly opposed the deal chiefly because her main challenger, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), has also done so. If she were to get nominated, if she were to be elected, I have a hunch that what runs in the family is you get a little practical if you ever get the job, he said.
Donohue also said TPP will not be voted on prior to the election because Senate Republicans do not want to do anything that could jeopardize Republican Senators in close races. But he said he believed there was a 75 percent chance that TPP would get done in the lame-duck session after the election.
snip
Hillary Clinton flip-flops on Trans-Pacific Partnership
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/08/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-now-opposes-trans-pacific-partners/
"I still believe in the goal of a strong and fair trade agreement in the Pacific as part of a broader strategy both at home and abroad, just as I did when I was secretary of state," Clinton said in an Oct. 7 statement. "I appreciate the hard work that President Obama and his team put into this process and recognize the strides they made. But the bar here is very high and, based on what I have seen, I don't believe this agreement has met it."
Its up to voters to decide how they feel about her changed stance on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but we rate Clintons reversal as a Full Flop.
snip
The Democratic Partys Draft Platform Doesnt Oppose the TPPThats Bad Policy and Bad Politics
https://www.thenation.com/article/the-democrats-draft-platform-doesnt-oppose-tpp-thats-bad-policy-and-bad-politics/
In a Friday night showdown at the Democratic Party platform-drafting committee, the Clinton majority outvoted the Sanders delegates 10-5, rejecting any language specifically opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Instead, the majority substituted generic language that trade deals should protect workers rights and the environment, and a misleading sentence that claimed that Democrats are divided on trade. A year ago, 85 percent of House Democrats voted against a fast track on the TPP.
Both Presidents Clinton and Obama have maintained that their deals, from NAFTA to the TPP, had better language on the environment and workers rights than any previous trade agreement. The issue, of course, is that not a single agreement has provided anything meaningful for workers or preventing climate change or protecting consumers. The language may be better, but it is virtually unenforceable, especially compared to the reparations multinational corporations receive through their right to sue in private tribunals known as investor-state dispute settlement.
snip
One positive result is that there is much more attention to the evils of the TPP and growing pressure on the White House to not send it to Congress. Stopping the TPP will require massive resistance far beyond the Democratic convention. For Bernie supporters, and hopefully millions of others, the alarm has been sounded. We are waking up, standing up, and fighting back.
snip
In an interview from Davos with Bloomberg TV on January 20, Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue, a top lobbyist for the pro-corporate-power Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP] agreement, assured viewers that if Hillary Clinton wins the Presidential election, Clinton will support the TPP, even though she opposes it now.
Reporting on the interview, Inside U.S. Trade noted:
The Chamber president said he expected Hillary Clinton would ultimately support the TPP if she becomes the Democratic nominee for president and is elected. He argued that she has publicly opposed the deal chiefly because her main challenger, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), has also done so. If she were to get nominated, if she were to be elected, I have a hunch that what runs in the family is you get a little practical if you ever get the job, he said.
Donohue also said TPP will not be voted on prior to the election because Senate Republicans do not want to do anything that could jeopardize Republican Senators in close races. But he said he believed there was a 75 percent chance that TPP would get done in the lame-duck session after the election.
snip
Hillary Clinton flip-flops on Trans-Pacific Partnership
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/08/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-now-opposes-trans-pacific-partners/
"I still believe in the goal of a strong and fair trade agreement in the Pacific as part of a broader strategy both at home and abroad, just as I did when I was secretary of state," Clinton said in an Oct. 7 statement. "I appreciate the hard work that President Obama and his team put into this process and recognize the strides they made. But the bar here is very high and, based on what I have seen, I don't believe this agreement has met it."
Its up to voters to decide how they feel about her changed stance on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but we rate Clintons reversal as a Full Flop.
snip
The Democratic Partys Draft Platform Doesnt Oppose the TPPThats Bad Policy and Bad Politics
https://www.thenation.com/article/the-democrats-draft-platform-doesnt-oppose-tpp-thats-bad-policy-and-bad-politics/
In a Friday night showdown at the Democratic Party platform-drafting committee, the Clinton majority outvoted the Sanders delegates 10-5, rejecting any language specifically opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Instead, the majority substituted generic language that trade deals should protect workers rights and the environment, and a misleading sentence that claimed that Democrats are divided on trade. A year ago, 85 percent of House Democrats voted against a fast track on the TPP.
Both Presidents Clinton and Obama have maintained that their deals, from NAFTA to the TPP, had better language on the environment and workers rights than any previous trade agreement. The issue, of course, is that not a single agreement has provided anything meaningful for workers or preventing climate change or protecting consumers. The language may be better, but it is virtually unenforceable, especially compared to the reparations multinational corporations receive through their right to sue in private tribunals known as investor-state dispute settlement.
snip
One positive result is that there is much more attention to the evils of the TPP and growing pressure on the White House to not send it to Congress. Stopping the TPP will require massive resistance far beyond the Democratic convention. For Bernie supporters, and hopefully millions of others, the alarm has been sounded. We are waking up, standing up, and fighting back.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would be a lot easier to determine where she stands if she stood against it from the get-go.
PoliticalMalcontent
Jul 2016
#45
"Vehemently"? I don't think so. And the "TPP" that she was originally in favor of is not the TPP..
George II
Jul 2016
#50
I guess my question would be why push for something when it's not a finished product...
PoliticalMalcontent
Jul 2016
#68
Why push for something before it's finished? If every public official waited for something.....
George II
Jul 2016
#69
Yes, she explained why she changed her mind. Basically she saw what many other people saw...
George II
Jul 2016
#78
Corporations do not have that right but national governments have the right to allow foreign
pampango
Jul 2016
#20
May I ask you WHY you feel that way, concerning Hillary? Sources,links and quotes please...
REALforever
Jul 2016
#9
I can't be sure, but given her earlier very strong support of TPP and other trade deals,
Vattel
Jul 2016
#11
She will be referred to as having "evolved". Lots of evolving going around. n/t
jtuck004
Jul 2016
#64
Chamber of Commerce Lobbyist Tom Donohue: Clinton Will Support TPP After Election
AntiBank
Jul 2016
#30
I agree.. It seems like there's a "ANY Trade Agreement is Shit" Movement afoot.
REALforever
Jul 2016
#10
Great point. There are good trade agreements - like FDR's - and bad trade agreements.
pampango
Jul 2016
#22
Do you believe "trade agreements" are negotiated with people in mind rather than corporations? nt
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2016
#37
Robert Reich under the bus as a TPP denialist by the corporatist patrol on 3,2,1...
AntiBank
Jul 2016
#26
The only good trade agreement is one that deals with mutually agreed tariff reductions--
eridani
Jul 2016
#40
And for those who do not know this, they should read your link. Thanks for posting.
lonestarnot
Jul 2016
#79