Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
30. Chamber of Commerce Lobbyist Tom Donohue: Clinton Will Support TPP After Election
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 05:44 PM
Jul 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/chamber-of-commerce-lobby_b_9104096.html

In an interview from Davos with Bloomberg TV on January 20, Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue, a top lobbyist for the pro-corporate-power Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP] agreement, assured viewers that if Hillary Clinton wins the Presidential election, Clinton will support the TPP, even though she opposes it now.

Reporting on the interview, Inside U.S. Trade noted:

The Chamber president said he expected Hillary Clinton would ultimately support the TPP if she becomes the Democratic nominee for president and is elected. He argued that she has publicly opposed the deal chiefly because her main challenger, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), has also done so. “If she were to get nominated, if she were to be elected, I have a hunch that what runs in the family is you get a little practical if you ever get the job,” he said.


Donohue also said TPP will not be voted on prior to the election because Senate Republicans do not want to do anything that could jeopardize Republican Senators in close races. But he said he believed there was a 75 percent chance that TPP would get done in the lame-duck session after the election.


snip



Hillary Clinton flip-flops on Trans-Pacific Partnership


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/08/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-now-opposes-trans-pacific-partners/

"I still believe in the goal of a strong and fair trade agreement in the Pacific as part of a broader strategy both at home and abroad, just as I did when I was secretary of state," Clinton said in an Oct. 7 statement. "I appreciate the hard work that President Obama and his team put into this process and recognize the strides they made. But the bar here is very high and, based on what I have seen, I don't believe this agreement has met it."

It’s up to voters to decide how they feel about her changed stance on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but we rate Clinton’s reversal as a Full Flop.

snip



The Democratic Party’s Draft Platform Doesn’t Oppose the TPP—That’s Bad Policy and Bad Politics

https://www.thenation.com/article/the-democrats-draft-platform-doesnt-oppose-tpp-thats-bad-policy-and-bad-politics/

In a Friday night showdown at the Democratic Party platform-drafting committee, the Clinton majority outvoted the Sanders delegates 10-5, rejecting any language specifically opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Instead, the majority substituted generic language that trade deals should protect workers’ rights and the environment, and a misleading sentence that claimed that Democrats are divided on trade. A year ago, 85 percent of House Democrats voted against a fast track on the TPP.

Both Presidents Clinton and Obama have maintained that their deals, from NAFTA to the TPP, had better language on the environment and workers’ rights than any previous trade agreement. The issue, of course, is that not a single agreement has provided anything meaningful for workers or preventing climate change or protecting consumers. The language may be better, but it is virtually unenforceable, especially compared to the reparations multinational corporations receive through their right to sue in private tribunals known as investor-state dispute settlement.

snip

One positive result is that there is much more attention to the evils of the TPP and growing pressure on the White House to not send it to Congress. Stopping the TPP will require massive resistance far beyond the Democratic convention. For Bernie supporters, and hopefully millions of others, the alarm has been sounded. We are waking up, standing up, and fighting back.

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R'd! snot Jul 2016 #1
Um, Dr. Reich, Hillary Clinton is FOR the TPP... modestybl Jul 2016 #5
"Hillary Clinton is FOR the TPP"? red dog 1 Jul 2016 #24
The pudding has yet to be made. In it, we will find the proof. nt cherokeeprogressive Jul 2016 #36
Would be a lot easier to determine where she stands if she stood against it from the get-go. PoliticalMalcontent Jul 2016 #45
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ This Avalon Sparks Jul 2016 #47
"Vehemently"? I don't think so. And the "TPP" that she was originally in favor of is not the TPP.. George II Jul 2016 #50
How so? sulphurdunn Jul 2016 #54
She said how in her formal statement when she came out against it. George II Jul 2016 #56
Got a link? sulphurdunn Jul 2016 #57
hillaryclinton.com George II Jul 2016 #58
Can't find a word sulphurdunn Jul 2016 #59
Can you please link to it reflection Jul 2016 #60
This search dvduval Jul 2016 #61
Wants to redo nafta too dvduval Jul 2016 #62
Thank you reflection Jul 2016 #67
I guess my question would be why push for something when it's not a finished product... PoliticalMalcontent Jul 2016 #68
Why push for something before it's finished? If every public official waited for something..... George II Jul 2016 #69
Yes, you push for things you support before they are finished. PoliticalMalcontent Jul 2016 #75
Yes, she explained why she changed her mind. Basically she saw what many other people saw... George II Jul 2016 #78
Clinton majority voted for the TPP liberal from boston Jul 2016 #71
This. He stands against the Party, thus us, on this issue (ntxt) scscholar Jul 2016 #76
TPP ISDS and the Democrats Arizona Roadrunner Jul 2016 #2
Exactly! elleng Jul 2016 #3
That's not what happened in Egypt, Veolia v. Egypt bhikkhu Jul 2016 #6
What right does any corporation have to do business in a foreign country? fasttense Jul 2016 #14
Corporations do not have that right but national governments have the right to allow foreign pampango Jul 2016 #20
Its just standard contract law bhikkhu Jul 2016 #34
huh, I remember contracts made with unions and workers that were trashed fasttense Jul 2016 #55
One for the bookmarks! forest444 Jul 2016 #7
+ 1 red dog 1 Jul 2016 #23
Reich is wrong about one thing: Hillary is not really against TPP. Vattel Jul 2016 #4
May I ask you WHY you feel that way, concerning Hillary? Sources,links and quotes please... REALforever Jul 2016 #9
I can't be sure, but given her earlier very strong support of TPP and other trade deals, Vattel Jul 2016 #11
+10 SHRED Jul 2016 #13
A little bit of recent history... modestybl Jul 2016 #17
Yep. After the election, I've little doubt that she will proclaim Marr Jul 2016 #38
So True sangfroid Jul 2016 #43
Yep. SheilaT Jul 2016 #51
She will be referred to as having "evolved". Lots of evolving going around. n/t jtuck004 Jul 2016 #64
Chamber of Commerce Lobbyist Tom Donohue: Clinton Will Support TPP After Election AntiBank Jul 2016 #30
oh boy-- Fast Walker 52 Jul 2016 #65
they asked for links AntiBank Jul 2016 #66
I know Fast Walker 52 Jul 2016 #73
I wish there was a point-by-point summary somewhere of what is wrong with it bhikkhu Jul 2016 #8
I agree.. It seems like there's a "ANY Trade Agreement is Shit" Movement afoot. REALforever Jul 2016 #10
You got it. ALL free trade agreements are sh*t. fasttense Jul 2016 #16
Great point. There are good trade agreements - like FDR's - and bad trade agreements. pampango Jul 2016 #22
This isn't really about trade... modestybl Jul 2016 #29
Do you believe "trade agreements" are negotiated with people in mind rather than corporations? nt cherokeeprogressive Jul 2016 #37
It's the special tribunals just for corporations to sue nations fasttense Jul 2016 #15
I understand the concern, but we already have that with the WTO bhikkhu Jul 2016 #35
Part of the problem - we aren't allow to read the treaty itself... modestybl Jul 2016 #18
The full text is right here: pampango Jul 2016 #21
That is a lot... but section 8 alone should scare you... modestybl Jul 2016 #27
Even in the summary... section 7 should scare you... modestybl Jul 2016 #19
No they don't Egnever Jul 2016 #63
Yeah, they so ... it will cost... modestybl Jul 2016 #70
Pretty hard to rectify that nonsense with the actual text from the TPP Egnever Jul 2016 #74
Nonsense to question environmental safeguards? modestybl Jul 2016 #77
Nonsense to claim the TPP prevents them in any way Egnever Jul 2016 #80
That's an understatement. nt silvershadow Jul 2016 #12
I've already signed that petition red dog 1 Jul 2016 #25
Just signed it! chwaliszewski Jul 2016 #52
Robert Reich under the bus as a TPP denialist by the corporatist patrol on 3,2,1... AntiBank Jul 2016 #26
Recommended Ellen. guillaumeb Jul 2016 #28
Well... Else You Are Mad Jul 2016 #31
True. and if they get even richer guillaumeb Jul 2016 #41
Thanks, guillaumeb. elleng Jul 2016 #33
Reich is wrong. A lot. eom MohRokTah Jul 2016 #32
I've noticed you never actually make an argument on this. Marr Jul 2016 #39
You are not alone in noticing. guillaumeb Jul 2016 #42
The only good trade agreement is one that deals with mutually agreed tariff reductions-- eridani Jul 2016 #40
K&R liberalla Jul 2016 #44
K&R ornotna Jul 2016 #46
If Hillary Against It Then Tell Them To Reject It billhicks76 Jul 2016 #48
Good idea. Dem ptb can't, apparently, bring themselves to do the right thing. elleng Jul 2016 #49
Yep colsohlibgal Jul 2016 #53
Elizabeth Warren is alarmed by this... modestybl Jul 2016 #72
And for those who do not know this, they should read your link. Thanks for posting. lonestarnot Jul 2016 #79
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»by Robert Reich:The Trans...»Reply #30