Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When Karl Rove deleted 22 million White House emails and the media yawned. [View all]spanone
(141,008 posts)2. Bush White House email controversy - a quick history...
The Bush White House email controversy surfaced in 2007 during the controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, and the Hatch Act.[1] Over 5 million emails may have been lost.[2][3] Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations.[4] In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.[5]
The administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[6] for various communications of unknown content or purpose. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The server came public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[7] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[8]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[9]), but, unlike these two servers, gwb43.com has no Web server connected to it it is used only for email.[10]
The "gwb43.com" domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation.[11] Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[12] The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[13]
On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts."[14] Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email themselves.
The administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[6] for various communications of unknown content or purpose. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The server came public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[7] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[8]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[9]), but, unlike these two servers, gwb43.com has no Web server connected to it it is used only for email.[10]
The "gwb43.com" domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation.[11] Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[12] The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[13]
On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts."[14] Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email themselves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When Karl Rove deleted 22 million White House emails and the media yawned. [View all]
pnwmom
Jul 2016
OP
That incident is exactly why I expect better from our candidates and office holders
loyalsister
Jul 2016
#4
This is all well known but the Ohio Dem. Party and the National Dem. Party will not say a word.
Botany
Jul 2016
#85
If what Karl Rove does is our guiding light of right and wrong we are truly screwed
krawhitham
Jul 2016
#5
We did MUCH better. Hillary retained all her emails and produced them, in paper as the law
pnwmom
Jul 2016
#8
Ok, I agree that Hillary's transmittal of secret/top secret emails might have been unintentional
TeddyR
Jul 2016
#61
She didn't lie about it. She couldn't control every email that came in, only the ones
pnwmom
Jul 2016
#62
You don't understand that Hillary was the Head of the State Department -- not an
pnwmom
Jul 2016
#78
No. Nixon was making that as a general claim. This relates to a specific procedure,
pnwmom
Jul 2016
#114
Yup, there was screaming about it here. And he wasn't even running for president. (n/t)
thesquanderer
Jul 2016
#12
It can be difficult to understand difference in specific instances when your bias relies on that...
LanternWaste
Jul 2016
#15
Which buffoonish rule maintains the pretense that two wholly separate instances are precisely the sa
LanternWaste
Jul 2016
#18
It is a real freedom-fest for those in high places. Meanwhile, police are bringing charges
silvershadow
Jul 2016
#22
The OP is actually about the difference in the way the Bush regime was treated in contrast to
MADem
Jul 2016
#33
I raised this with a Trump Guy at the gym and began spewing spittle and vile at me. I laughed.
kairos12
Jul 2016
#25
I will bet you that they said nothing because there was probably enough in those
cstanleytech
Jul 2016
#68
Don't forget which administration and which useless atty. gen'l declined to pursue Bush admin. crime
Hoppy
Jul 2016
#73