Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Monsanto's Mommy Bloggers and Clandestine Spies [View all]
From Mommy Bloggers to Clandestine Spies, Here's How Monsanto's PR Company Controls the GMO Debate
Big Ag public relations has an image problem of its own. - It's a longish article but worth the read. Some excerpts.
Sen. Bernie Sanders sent out an email to supporters Friday asking them to take action against a Senate bill that would overturn Vermont's recent legislation requiring companies to label products containing genetically modified organisms.
"The corporate interests are at it again," Sanders wrote. "Monsanto, agribusiness and the bio-tech industry have spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to overturn legislation passed by Vermont, Connecticut, Maine and Alaska that calls for the labeling of GMO food. In fact, they are moving aggressively now because Vermont's strong law goes into effect today."
"The corporate interests are at it again," Sanders wrote. "Monsanto, agribusiness and the bio-tech industry have spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to overturn legislation passed by Vermont, Connecticut, Maine and Alaska that calls for the labeling of GMO food. In fact, they are moving aggressively now because Vermont's strong law goes into effect today."
For many, the most incredible aspect of Big Ags push for increased use of GMOs is the fervency with which these companies lobby against bills that would require labels for foods that contain GM ingredients. Industry executives argue that labels scare consumers away from purchasing genetically modified foods. As blogger Ana Picazo told Modern Farmer, People deserve to know whats in their foods. Its called informed consent.
One of the largest purveyors of pro-GMO literature is the Council for Biotechnology Information, a front group funded by the Big 6 pesticide and GMO corporations: Monsanto, BASF, Bayer, Dow, Dupont and Sygenta. The council hired the PR form Ketchum (which formerly worked on Brown & Williamsons cigarette campaigns) to create the website GMOAnswers.com, a pro-GMO website that claims to answer your questions about GMOs using independent experts. As Reuters notes, the council is committed to spending millions more annually for several more years on this campaign.
http://www.alternet.org/food/mommy-bloggers-clandestine-spies-heres-how-monsantos-pr-company-controls-gmo-debate
Andre Kimball, executive director of the Center for Food Safety, agrees, telling Huffington Post, We are appalled that our elected officials would support keeping Americans in the dark about what is in our food and even more appalled that they would do it on behalf of Big Chemical and food corporations.
http://www.alternet.org/food/mommy-bloggers-clandestine-spies-heres-how-monsantos-pr-company-controls-gmo-debate
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good point. Consider how many people are convinced homeopathy and chemtrails are nonsense.
Major Nikon
Jul 2016
#4
Call your senators to voice your opinion Even if they voted against the DARK act last
Person 2713
Jul 2016
#2
How many times do you usually have to throw against the wall before it sticks?
Major Nikon
Jul 2016
#10
They have to repeat fiction as often as possible in order to convince some that it's not fiction.
HuckleB
Jul 2016
#18
Wait. Don't Monsanto, BASF, Bayer, Dow, Dupont and Sygenta also sell Non-GMO products?
progressoid
Jul 2016
#5
No is making fun of anything. Some of us don't like fictions being passed as fact.
HuckleB
Jul 2016
#19
Exactly, and many of those seeds the local farmers use your probably sourced from Monsanto itself...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#14
Yes indeed. I'm sure that a few of the locals, the ones who are into 'heirloom' vegetables
GoneOffShore
Jul 2016
#15
There's a great set of videos by a chemist on youtube called Myles Power...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#16
Oh, the OP is a huge fan and follower of "The Food Babe". As if her credibility can't be...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#24
So taking antiobiotics and chemicals out of foods according to you is Woo
womanofthehills
Jul 2016
#25
The "Food Babe" philosophy is, "if I can't pronounce the ingredient its bad for you!"...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#29
Actually, the "Food Babe" philosophy is I don't want antibiotics in my food
womanofthehills
Jul 2016
#57
Does any of that shit actually make the food healthier? No, it does not, all you have shown...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#28
Unless you are eating humans, there are no "human antibiotics" in your food
Major Nikon
Jul 2016
#82
What issues? That's the problem, when you make up shit on the fly to prop...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#38
I think its because it skirts the conspiracy theory line, but not quite crosses it...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#45
Do you have any evidence for this accusation, and are you saying girls...
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#66
Very telling how you used screen shots rather than posting a link to the actual article
Major Nikon
Jul 2016
#81
Maybe they will not kill you but Monsanto is the Great Satan to the poor children in Argentina
womanofthehills
Jul 2016
#22
So why do you think 38 countries have banned GMO's - will you say this is not true too?
womanofthehills
Jul 2016
#47
All it demonstrates is that politics isn't necessarily driven by evidence, no more, no less....
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#65
Why do you think every regulatory and science advocacy organization on the planet supports GMO?
Major Nikon
Jul 2016
#83
Please don't talk of rudeness if you're going to ascribe ugly ulterior motives to DUers
Major Nikon
Jul 2016
#41
Again, is there any evidence, or do you like pushing ideology rather than science?
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#36
Evidence, evidence, evidence, that's what we need, otherwise you are just making shit up. n/t
Humanist_Activist
Jul 2016
#67