General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When Karl Rove deleted 22 million White House emails and the media yawned. [View all]pnwmom
(110,190 posts)He only offered his opinion that the "unclassified system was no place for that conversation."
And numerous articles have mentioned that different departments of the government had different standards and opinions about what information needs to be classified. The head of the national archives, which is in charge of storing all this information, says that the majority of information actually marked classified doesn't need to be classified. But there is no downside for over-classification, so it often occurs.
There is no such thing as "born classified" information, despite some of the false claims you will read by RWers. There is a specific process for classifying and declassifying info, and Hillary never sent any email that had been classified as such.
http://prospect.org/article/why-hillary-wont-be-indicted-and-shouldnt-be-objective-legal-analysis
Why Hillary Won't Be Indicted and Shouldn't Be: An Objective Legal Analysis
There is no reason to think that Clinton committed any crimes with respect to the use of her email server.
Richard O. Lempert, University of Michigan Professor of Law
Again, the most important words are the ones I have italicized. First, they indicate that the material must have been classified at the time of disclosure. Post hoc classification, which seems to characterize most of the classified material found on Clintons server, cannot support an indictment under this section. Second, information no matter how obviously sensitive does not classify itself; it must be officially and specifically designated as such.