General Discussion

markj757

(194 posts)

84. I have been a die-hard Democrat all of my life, and the only intellectually dishonest bullshit is

Thu Jul 7, 2016, 12:15 PM

Jul 2016

Last edited Thu Jul 7, 2016, 12:52 PM - Edit history (1)

what you just posted. If I state facts and express reasonable opinions based on those facts, I have to read ignorant comments like yours that have no basis in fact. I don't promote GOP talking points against Democrats, because I am a Democrat. I just happen to have well informed opinions contrary to yours, which based on your ignorant comment, doesn't surprise me at all. I'm not going to whitewash Hillary Clinton serious misjudgments regarding protecting classified information because she is our nominee. I am an American citizen who loves this country first and foremost, who is also proud to be a Democrat.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State Dept confirms FBI got it wrong, none of Hillary Clinton�s emails were classified at the time [View all] DonViejo Jul 2016 OP

IMPEACH HER! Orrex Jul 2016 #1

You are kidding, right? hertopos Jul 2016 #3

IMPEACH YOU TOO! Orrex Jul 2016 #13

*gasps* MynameisBlarney Jul 2016 #15

I Love 'em! Night Watchman Jul 2016 #17

as long as there washed I have no predjudice against peaches still_one Jul 2016 #60

Mmmmmmmm peach lapucelle Jul 2016 #77

Impeach cobbler is my favorite OriginalGeek Jul 2016 #104

I read the first response to your post, and miss your infamous red sig line. nt msanthrope Jul 2016 #4

LOL Orrex Jul 2016 #14

Let me guess: you have three posts hidden. Dr. Strange Jul 2016 #67

Actually, Skinner offered me a co-admin gig because of those first two Orrex Jul 2016 #70

Wow, co-admin. Pretty cool. Dr. Strange Jul 2016 #72

Religious discrimination is never pretty. Orrex Jul 2016 #73

Now, now... Let's get her elected first. nt fleabiscuit Jul 2016 #101

Did "State" refute the report of State's Inspector General? merrily Jul 2016 #2

Comey did a number on Hillary Cryptoad Jul 2016 #5

Absolutely Zoonart Jul 2016 #11

so Comey is going to spend the next few months being interviewed by Congress? greymattermom Jul 2016 #16

From the first 15 minutes of that press conference... TipTok Jul 2016 #79

The condensending tone was palpable Cosmocat Jul 2016 #94

Well, well, well.... kentuck Jul 2016 #6

K&R jpak Jul 2016 #7

Why isn't this being reported? tavernier Jul 2016 #8

exactly Ligyron Jul 2016 #12

Oh My malaise Jul 2016 #9

WHAT?!? Zoonart Jul 2016 #10

I had a hunch that was part of the root of the problem. Ilsa Jul 2016 #26

You nailed it. The .gov system that they were saying she should have used pnwmom Jul 2016 #118

Anyone still have confidence in the FBI? State Department? She told the truth, they were inept. Laser102 Jul 2016 #18

Here�s Why Hillary Clinton Isn�t a Liar and James Comey Needs to Shut the Entire Hell Up Night Watchman Jul 2016 #19

I just have to say this, because this is getting ridiculous..... markj757 Jul 2016 #20

Except for that mention in your post, "I'm voting for Hillary", the rest is exactly the argument BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #28

Actually, your making my point..... markj757 Jul 2016 #35

No. Actually I'm *disputing* your points. And taking President Obama's words out of context is yet BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #38

If quoting President Obama stating "I don't THINK it posed a national security problem" markj757 Jul 2016 #44

Your capitalization of THINK is transparent spin. We understand your agenda no matter emulatorloo Jul 2016 #54

If getting stuck on Obama's "think" word - since he could not SAY "believe" since this was still BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #59

Some will say ANYTHING to slime Democrats and promote GOP talking points against emulatorloo Jul 2016 #64

I have been a die-hard Democrat all of my life, and the only intellectually dishonest bullshit is markj757 Jul 2016 #84

Your "Well informed opinion" seems based on Fox News 'experts' and sites like Breitbart. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #85

Believe it or not, I respect and appreciate the passion in which you defend your position.... markj757 Jul 2016 #87

Ok, I want to explain some things.. And I want to apologize about something. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #91

Thank you very much markj757 Jul 2016 #97

... emulatorloo Jul 2016 #98

These are some good, strong takes. PoliticalMalcontent Jul 2016 #112

I agree. 100%. eom BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #86

Which part is factually incorrect? TipTok Jul 2016 #80

Pretty much ALL of it. Read the subthread yourself. I'm not going to rehash it for you. BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #89

This is false, none of them were marked classified this is the MSM meme that Chuck Todd got.... uponit7771 Jul 2016 #31

You don't know what your talking about..... markj757 Jul 2016 #33

I do and those weren't CLEARLY marked classified, Comey just reitered there were "markings"... uponit7771 Jul 2016 #50

They did not have the usual Classified headings radical noodle Jul 2016 #103

I understand that many folks don't have experience with the security classification system... TipTok Jul 2016 #111

Comey just re-iterated that it is NOT false during this "hearing" today 7962 Jul 2016 #46

I just hear him, there were MARKINGS... the security lawyer repeated this yesterday that uponit7771 Jul 2016 #51

OK, just rewound the DVR... yes, he said MARKINGS ... not CLEARLY MARKED classified and the secuirty uponit7771 Jul 2016 #56

Again, splitting hairs. 7962 Jul 2016 #61

Nope, just said that CLINTON wouldn't know that the (C) marking would know that it was classified uponit7771 Jul 2016 #63

SHOULD KNOW isn't relevant but even using your logic Comey JUST SAID that he doesn't think that uponit7771 Jul 2016 #65

Comey just now said admitted the docs that DID have classified data wasn't properly marked ... uponit7771 Jul 2016 #75

THERE IT IS!! Comey said he wouldn't be sure that she knew (C) marking would be classified!! uponit7771 Jul 2016 #62

Again, it doesnt matter. 7962 Jul 2016 #76

It does now, Comey just said even the emails that HAD classified data in them weren't properly marke uponit7771 Jul 2016 #81

People don't understand what "classified" is. Emails with phone #s can be marked classified. haele Jul 2016 #93

Yeap, this is about what Comey is saying that people don't know how to handle classified docs in uponit7771 Jul 2016 #96

Comey's job is to make recommendations based on the law. lapucelle Jul 2016 #32

Actually, Comey cleary states some of the emails were MARKED classified, just not how many markj757 Jul 2016 #36

False, he just said there were MARKINGS... that's not CLEARLY MARKED ... and that's the sophistry uponit7771 Jul 2016 #57

I'm curious... GaYellowDawg Jul 2016 #69

I definitely take some comfort in knowing that at least what was marked classified was information markj757 Jul 2016 #90

Fair enough. GaYellowDawg Jul 2016 #92

Your welcome...I also want to mention.... markj757 Jul 2016 #95

"marked incorrectly?" librechik Jul 2016 #21

DEVELOPING: New State Dept. Revelation of Classified Marking Error Supports Hillary on Emails Her Sister Jul 2016 #22

Who in the State Dept said that? Rafale Jul 2016 #23

John Kirby of State Dept. This was reported by AP and I posted it to LBN yesterday wishstar Jul 2016 #43

Comey was Senate Whitewater counsel from years ago. Cass Jul 2016 #24

Comey = Republican shill and plant. After his behavior the other day, he's lost all credibility BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #29

Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #25

David Brock and bluenation review has such little credibility with me, Jarqui Jul 2016 #27

Yes, best to rely on Paul Ryan, Fox News 'experts' and Breitbart emulatorloo Jul 2016 #58

+1 n/t JTFrog Jul 2016 #78

Obviously, from your post, you've been reading them Jarqui Jul 2016 #108

have you commented on the fact that mainstream geek tragedy Jul 2016 #88

What does any of this have to do with David Brock and Bluenation Review? nt Jarqui Jul 2016 #106

So you have the Jason Chaffetz and Darrell Issa geek tragedy Jul 2016 #107

Nope. You're creating a straw man Jarqui Jul 2016 #109

Comey testified for hours today as to why you and the Republicans are wrong geek tragedy Jul 2016 #110

Show us the law where it says you can keep top secret information belonging Jarqui Jul 2016 #113

where did you get your law degree, Google U? nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #114

At a place where, unlike yourself, Jarqui Jul 2016 #115

the only legal 'analysis' you've provided is links to statutes and geek tragedy Jul 2016 #116

But that was pure conjecture because ... Jarqui Jul 2016 #117

This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Jul 2016 #119

I'm getting whiplash. Ilsa Jul 2016 #30

Bill must have visited the State Department yesterday. Gene Debs Jul 2016 #42

oh, please. not funny. nt Ilsa Jul 2016 #53

What a useless, horseshit statement. GaYellowDawg Jul 2016 #68

There ya go. nt 7962 Jul 2016 #47

No wonder they are having 20 Congressional investigations of Comey lying! L. Coyote Jul 2016 #34

as i said in my prior posts endless enquiries and billions misspent allan01 Jul 2016 #37

Um.... vkkv Jul 2016 #39

There should be a rule portlander23 Jul 2016 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Gene Debs Jul 2016 #41

That's simply not true at all. DesMoinesDem Jul 2016 #45

it seems as though most folks here arent getting that. 7962 Jul 2016 #48

The NY Times was not clear enough to pin this down to just 2 emails Mr. Sparkle Jul 2016 #49

AP reported this explanation of the 2 emails by John Kirby of State Dept (Posted in LBN yesterday) wishstar Jul 2016 #55

Thanks . Comey just mentioned today in testimony that he "thinks" there were 3 documents Mr. Sparkle Jul 2016 #71

I surprised the republicans have not already tried to get rid of the FBI liberal N proud Jul 2016 #52

Great news Gothmog Jul 2016 #66

I hope this get discussed on the shows tonight. They have been brutal against her with this. lunamagica Jul 2016 #74

One thing the public doesn't understand but should lapfog_1 Jul 2016 #82

I strongly disagree... markj757 Jul 2016 #100

yes, you are correct about the SecState lapfog_1 Jul 2016 #105

It is just the standard turf war situation. The other agencies would like pnwmom Jul 2016 #120

Will the GOP ask the State Dept to appear? Jitter65 Jul 2016 #83

Hahahahahahahahahahaha! ismnotwasm Jul 2016 #99

I wish people would get their facts straight SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2016 #102

Sometimes the same information comes to State from a source outside of pnwmom Jul 2016 #121

Posting the same incorrect stuff over and over again SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2016 #122

I know that. But I didn't realize you did. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #123