General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This Shocking New York Daily News Cover of Alton Sterling Is Drawing Heavy Responses [View all]MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)They said this particular incident was racist violence, but gave no indication what led them to believe that.
Are you saying we should start with the premise that all police killings of persons of color are racially motivated, and then work our way backwards from there and eventually (maybe) exonerate the police officer from those accusations, but only if there is absolutely no evidence that the officer was racially motivated? Otherwise they're a bigot by default?
If so, should we likewise start with the premise that all police killings of white people are not only not racially motivated, but are justified?
There is NOONE on DU saying this was a justified killing. But you (and many DUers) seem to be having trouble separating (as always occurs with these stories) an unjustified police killing from a racially motivated police killing, and seem to assume that an unjustified killing of a person of color is ALWAYS racially motivated (regardless of whether there is any evidence, such as the perpetrator's background/work history, to support that assertion). And that is why we are painted as "not caring about facts."
You can have a stupid cop perform an entirely unjustified killing, on any individual of any race, for no other reason than it was a stupid cop; in fact, it happens hundreds of times a year.