Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It pains me to say this, but what the hell did they expect? [View all]loyalsister
(13,390 posts)109. I assume you're operating with a literal definition?
Blowback is a word that has been used metaphorocally to describe unintended consequences and or responses not predicted (although they may have been reasonably predictable).
Originally, blowback was CIA internal coinage denoting the unintended, harmful consequencesto friendly populations and military forceswhen a given weapon is used beyond its purpose as intended by the party supplying it. Examples include anti-Western religious figures (e.g. Osama bin Laden) who, in due course, attack foe and sponsor; right-wing counter-revolutionaries who sell drugs to their sponsors civil populace (see CIA and Contras cocaine trafficking in the US); and banana republic juntas (see Salvadoran Civil War) who kill American reporters or nuns (e.g. Dorothy Kazel).[citation needed]
In formal print usage, the term blowback first appeared in the Clandestine Service HistoryOverthrow of Premier Mossadeq of IranNovember 1952August 1953, the CIA's internal history of the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, sponsored by the US and UK, which was published in March 1954.[2][3] Blowback from this operation would indeed occur with the Iranian Revolution and the Iran hostage crisis. Recent accounts of how blowback functioned in the War on Terror relation to US and UK intelligence and defense propaganda and became an important issue in a 21st Century media environment are discussed by Dr Emma Louise Briant in her book Propaganda and Counter-terrorism which presents first hand accounts and discussions of deliberate and unintended consequences of blowback, oversight and impacts for the public. [4] [5]
Afghanistan and Al Qaeda[edit]
Examples of blowback include the CIAs financing and support for Afghan insurgents to fight an anti-Communist proxy guerilla war against the USSR in Afghanistan; some of the beneficiaries of this CIA support joined al-Qaeda's terrorist campaign against the United States.[13] In relation to US propaganda, where black propaganda for foreign audiences might enter the domestic media there is little to prevent this occurring and protections and oversight have been criticised by Dr Emma Louise Briant. [14]
Syria and ISIS[edit]
During the Syrian Civil War, United States and Saudi Arabia supported and aided anti-Assad armed groups.[15][16] Some of those groups later shifted loyalty to ISIS.[17]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowback_(intelligence)
In formal print usage, the term blowback first appeared in the Clandestine Service HistoryOverthrow of Premier Mossadeq of IranNovember 1952August 1953, the CIA's internal history of the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, sponsored by the US and UK, which was published in March 1954.[2][3] Blowback from this operation would indeed occur with the Iranian Revolution and the Iran hostage crisis. Recent accounts of how blowback functioned in the War on Terror relation to US and UK intelligence and defense propaganda and became an important issue in a 21st Century media environment are discussed by Dr Emma Louise Briant in her book Propaganda and Counter-terrorism which presents first hand accounts and discussions of deliberate and unintended consequences of blowback, oversight and impacts for the public. [4] [5]
Afghanistan and Al Qaeda[edit]
Examples of blowback include the CIAs financing and support for Afghan insurgents to fight an anti-Communist proxy guerilla war against the USSR in Afghanistan; some of the beneficiaries of this CIA support joined al-Qaeda's terrorist campaign against the United States.[13] In relation to US propaganda, where black propaganda for foreign audiences might enter the domestic media there is little to prevent this occurring and protections and oversight have been criticised by Dr Emma Louise Briant. [14]
Syria and ISIS[edit]
During the Syrian Civil War, United States and Saudi Arabia supported and aided anti-Assad armed groups.[15][16] Some of those groups later shifted loyalty to ISIS.[17]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowback_(intelligence)
If you have a problem with the CIAs use of the word, take it up with them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unfortunately for the innocent Dallas cops, but the justice system can't just keep . . .
brush
Jul 2016
#1
Those cops in Dallas were. I do know that "innocent cops" is usually an oxymoron.
brush
Jul 2016
#11
OP has a point. At some point, the legal system fails (ie people lose faith in it). We can argue
MillennialDem
Jul 2016
#6
Sounds like those Dallas cops should have turned their guns on themselves.
Dreamer Tatum
Jul 2016
#12
It's just the logical extension of the argument that the cops had it coming.
Dreamer Tatum
Jul 2016
#27
No, it isn't but nice try. I never said cops had it coming, I said OP had a point that
MillennialDem
Jul 2016
#29
uh, no. This was a very unstable person who decided to randomly shoot police, that most likely
still_one
Jul 2016
#4
There is absolutely no justification to what happened in Dallas, just as there is no justification
still_one
Jul 2016
#31
All anyone needed to do was go to an Occupy camp to see this principle on
KingCharlemagne
Jul 2016
#32
That's exactly the point that Socialist_n-TN is making: the cops in today's society
KingCharlemagne
Jul 2016
#51
what are you saying, police were first create to catch escaped slaves? that is the
frankieallen
Jul 2016
#69
+1 ... the violence just serves to deflect the cause and excuse the response.
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#45
Well if past history is any prediction of future events, then you are correct
still_one
Jul 2016
#68
Exactly. Whether it is the cold blooded murder of an African American for just being black,
still_one
Jul 2016
#10
Yes, it does. The killings of five people last night in Dallas was terrible.
Photographer
Jul 2016
#18
No, I don't. The murderer should have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
Photographer
Jul 2016
#36
Give it a rest. You can't keep killing people year after year and no cop gets punished . . .
brush
Jul 2016
#41
Some will understand what is being /has been said ... others will work hard to not understand ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#53
ok. Then I would suggest a qualification, that SOME police are killing and abusing African
still_one
Jul 2016
#66
Then I read it wrong, and obviously misrepresented it in my exchange with you. Appreciate the
still_one
Jul 2016
#85
absolutely. That is the same mind set the racists use when they abuse people of color.
still_one
Jul 2016
#13
While DPD has serious problems, it is not like a lot of police forces that end up on the news
Ash_F
Jul 2016
#20
Yes. Sadly I think situations like this would be more the norm except for lack of trust
jonno99
Jul 2016
#97
Predictably the "Two Wrongs Make a Right" contingent is out in force today. Sad. Really sad.
WillowTree
Jul 2016
#73
Psychotic asshole cowards who wanted to "kill white people", especially white officers.
frankieallen
Jul 2016
#80